» Articles » PMID: 34100248

Anastomotic Leak: Toward an Understanding of Its Root Causes

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2021 Jun 8
PMID 34100248
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: When an anastomotic leak is discussed at a typical surgical morbidity and mortality conference, it is often presented as a due to an error in surgical technique involving ischemia, tension, or device failure. Here we assert that without direct visual analysis of the leak site and its tissue histology, an ex post facto claim that an anastomotic leak is due to an error in surgical technique remains speculative.

Methods: The arguments and rationale used to conclude that an anastomotic leak is due to an error in surgical technique are critically reviewed and assessed for their validity.

Results: No case series or literature exists in which a root cause analysis has been carried out with visual and tissue level evidence to determine the root cause(s) of an anastomotic leak.

Conclusions: At the individual case level, declaring that an anastomotic leak is due to an error in surgical technique without clear and compelling evidence either visually and/or at the tissue level to substantiate such a claim remains speculative.

Citing Articles

Development of a Clinical Framework-Anastomotic Leakage Prediction Score (CF-ALPS) After Colorectal Surgery.

Mulkut F, Ofluoglu C Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 40002606 PMC: 11854675. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15040455.


Non-Thermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma as an Adjunct to Intestinal Anastomosis: A Pilot Study on Preventing Anastomotic Leaks.

Betancourt-Angeles M, Lopez-Callejas R, Berrones-Stringel G, Jaramillo-Martinez C, Navarro-Luna B, Rodriguez-Mendez B Life (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39598248 PMC: 11595499. DOI: 10.3390/life14111450.


Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Adhesion Prevention Agents in Abdominal and Pelvic Surgeries: A Systematic Review.

Oliveira Souza Lima S, Kanemitsu K, Rashid M, Patel V, Ali M Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71280.

PMID: 39534835 PMC: 11554435. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71280.


[Modern approaches and technologies to prevent anastomotic leakage in the gastrointestinal tract].

Cira K, Wilhelm D, Neumann P Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024; 95(11):895-900.

PMID: 39341921 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-024-02179-7.


Primary Versus Revisional Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in Patients with a Body Mass Index ≥ 50 kg/m-90-Day Outcomes and Risk of Perioperative Mortality.

Abu-Abeid A, Dvir N, Lessing Y, Eldar S, Lahat G, Keidar A Obes Surg. 2024; 34(8):2872-2879.

PMID: 38879725 PMC: 11289037. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07310-5.


References
1.
Shirota Y, Hirase Y, Suda T, Miyazawa M, Hodo Y, Wakabayashi T . More than half of hypoxemia cases occurred during the recovery period after completion of esophagogastroduodenoscopy with planned moderate sedation. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):4312. PMC: 7063059. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61120-0. View

2.
Sajid M, Siddiqui M, Baig M . Single layer versus double layer suture anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 1:CD005477. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005477.pub4. View

3.
Wiegerinck M, Hyoju S, Mao J, Zaborin A, Adriaansens C, Salzman E . Novel de novo synthesized phosphate carrier compound ABA-PEG20k-Pi20 suppresses collagenase production in Enterococcus faecalis and prevents colonic anastomotic leak in an experimental model. Br J Surg. 2018; 105(10):1368-1376. PMC: 6827486. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10859. View

4.
Yang J, Chen Q, Jindou L, Cheng Y . The influence of anastomotic leakage for rectal cancer oncologic outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2020; 121(8):1283-1297. DOI: 10.1002/jso.25921. View

5.
Olivas A, Shogan B, Valuckaite V, Zaborin A, Belogortseva N, Musch M . Intestinal tissues induce an SNP mutation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa that enhances its virulence: possible role in anastomotic leak. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e44326. PMC: 3432121. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044326. View