» Articles » PMID: 34097154

Enhanced Recovery Protocol After Single-stage Bilateral Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Decreases Duration of Hospital Stay Without Increasing Complication Rates

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Jun 7
PMID 34097154
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: With an increasing number of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), protocols for better standard of patient care and shorter duration of hospital stay are necessary. Enhanced recovery (ER) protocols are becoming popular to meet these objectives. The current study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome of fast-track TKA using ER protocol in terms of length of hospital stay, perioperative complications and functional outcomes.

Methods: Patients undergoing single-stage bilateral primary TKA were prospectively included in the study. All patients went through a pre-defined ER protocol of TKA. Length of hospital stay, readmission rates, pain scores and functional scores of patients operated under ER protocol were compared with another matched historical control-group. Factors delaying the discharge of the patients by 48 h after the surgery were noted.

Results: We compared 275 patients undergoing single-stage bilateral primary TKA through ER protocol (Group 1) with 190 patients who had undergone bilateral primary TKA before the ER protocol was initiated (Group 2). The length of hospital stay (3.9 ± 2.1 days in group 1 and 7.5 ± 3.2 days in group 2, p 0.0001) and post-operative pain scores at 12 h (5.2 ± 2.9 in group 1 and 5.7 ± 2.1 in group 2, p 0.03) and 24 h (4.1 ± 1.6 in group 1 and 4.6 ± 1.4 in group 2, p 0.0005) were found to be significantly better with ER protocol. There was no difference in Oxford knee scores, infection rates, readmissions or mortality between the two groups.

Conclusion: ER protocol in single-stage bilateral primary TKA resulted in decreased length of hospital stay without increasing complications and compromising the clinical outcome. It requires an integrated approach and adherence to clinical pathways.

Level Of Evidence: Level II, Prospective comparative study.

Citing Articles

A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-stay programmes for total hip and knee replacement, focusing on safety and optimal patient selection.

Berkovic D, Vallance P, Harris I, Naylor J, Lewis P, de Steiger R BMC Med. 2023; 21(1):511.

PMID: 38129857 PMC: 10740291. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03219-5.

References
1.
McDonald D, Siegmeth R, Deakin A, Kinninmonth A, Scott N . An enhanced recovery programme for primary total knee arthroplasty in the United Kingdom--follow up at one year. Knee. 2011; 19(5):525-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.07.012. View

2.
Malviya A, Martin K, Harper I, Muller S, Emmerson K, Partington P . Enhanced recovery program for hip and knee replacement reduces death rate. Acta Orthop. 2011; 82(5):577-81. PMC: 3242954. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.618911. View

3.
Larsen K, Hvass K, Hansen T, Thomsen P, Soballe K . Effectiveness of accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention compared to current intervention after hip and knee arthroplasty. A before-after trial of 247 patients with a 3-month follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9:59. PMC: 2396162. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-59. View

4.
Scott N, McDonald D, Campbell J, Smith R, Carey A, Johnston I . The use of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles in Scottish orthopaedic units--an implementation and follow-up at 1 year, 2010-2011: a report from the Musculoskeletal Audit, Scotland. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 133(1):117-24. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-012-1619-z. View

5.
Isaac D, Falode T, Liu P, IAnson H, Dillow K, Gill P . Accelerated rehabilitation after total knee replacement. Knee. 2005; 12(5):346-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2004.11.007. View