» Articles » PMID: 34097044

Assessment of Effectiveness of 1 Dose of BNT162b2 Vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 Infection 13 to 24 Days After Immunization

Overview
Journal JAMA Netw Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Jun 7
PMID 34097044
Citations 93
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: The BNT162b2 vaccine showed high efficacy against COVID-19 in a phase III randomized clinical trial. A vaccine effectiveness evaluation in a real-world setting is needed.

Objective: To assess the short-term effectiveness of the first dose of the BNT162b2-vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infection 13 to 24 days after immunization in a real-world setting.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This comparative effectiveness study used data from a 2.6 million-member state-mandated health care system in Israel. Participants included all individuals aged 16 years and older who received 1 dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine between December 19, 2020, and January 15, 2021. Data were analyzed in March 2021.

Exposure: Receipt of 1 dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Information was collected regarding medical history and positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test and COVID-19 symptoms from 1 day after first vaccine to January 17, 2021. Daily and cumulative infection rates in days 13 to 24 were compared with days 1 to 12 after the first dose using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and generalized linear models.

Results: Data for 503 875 individuals (mean [SD] age, 59.7 [14.7] years; 263 228 [52.4%] women) were analyzed, of whom 351 897 had follow-up data for days 13 to 24. The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 2484 individuals (0.57%) during days 1 through 12 and 614 individuals (0.27%) in days 13 through 24. The weighted mean (SE) daily incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in days 1 through 12 was 43.41 (12.07) infections per 100 000 population and 21.08 (6.16) infections per 100 000 population in days 13 through 24, a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 51.4% (95% CI, 16.3%-71.8%). The decrease in incidence was evident from day 18 after the first dose. Similar RRRs were calculated in individuals aged 60 years or older (44.5%; 95% CI, 4.1%-67.9%), those younger than 60 years (50.2%; 95% CI, 14.1%-71.2%), women (50.0%; 95% CI, 13.5%-71.0%), and men (52.1%; 95% CI, 17.3%-72.2%). Findings were similar in subpopulations (eg, ultraorthodox Jewish: RRR, 53.5% [95% CI, 19.2%-73.2%]) and patients with various comorbidities (eg, cardiovascular diseases: RRR, 47.2% [95% CI, 7.8%-69.8%]). Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19 was 54.4% (95% CI, 21.4%-73.6%).

Conclusions And Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness study of a single dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, results were comparable to that of the phase III randomized clinical trial.

Citing Articles

Balancing fairness and efficiency in dynamic vaccine allocation during major infectious disease outbreaks.

Dai Z, Lan H, Hai N, Wang J, Wang H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1371.

PMID: 39779729 PMC: 11711769. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84027-6.


Early Elevated Inflammatory Markers in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinated Patients Are Associated with Reduced Mortality, Morbidity, and Lung Injury.

Khayat O, Basheer M, Derawy M, Assy N Life (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39598212 PMC: 11595982. DOI: 10.3390/life14111415.


The impact of underreported infections on vaccine effectiveness estimates derived from retrospective cohort studies.

Sacco C, Manica M, Marziano V, Fabiani M, Mateo-Urdiales A, Guzzetta G Int J Epidemiol. 2024; 53(3).

PMID: 38847783 PMC: 11157963. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyae077.


mRNA COVID-19 vaccine elicits potent adaptive immune response without the acute inflammation of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Ivanova E, Shwetar J, Devlin J, Buus T, Gray-Gaillard S, Koide A iScience. 2024; 26(12):108572.

PMID: 38213787 PMC: 10783604. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108572.


Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against hospitalisation in Latin America during three pandemic waves, 2021-2022: a test-negative case-control design.

Nogareda F, Regan A, Couto P, Fowlkes A, Gharpure R, Loayza S Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023; 27:100626.

PMID: 38035125 PMC: 10682274. DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100626.


References
1.
Weitzman D, Chodick G, Shalev V, Grossman C, Grossman E . Prevalence and factors associated with resistant hypertension in a large health maintenance organization in Israel. Hypertension. 2014; 64(3):501-7. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03718. View

2.
. Scientists tackle vaccine safety, efficacy and access at global R&D forum. Saudi Med J. 2021; 42(2):238. PMC: 7989273. View

3.
Mizrahi B, Shilo S, Rossman H, Kalkstein N, Marcus K, Barer Y . Longitudinal symptom dynamics of COVID-19 infection. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):6208. PMC: 7718370. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20053-y. View

4.
Jackson M, Phillips C, Benoit J, Kiniry E, Madziwa L, Nelson J . The impact of selection bias on vaccine effectiveness estimates from test-negative studies. Vaccine. 2017; 36(5):751-757. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.022. View

5.
Hak E, Verheij T, Grobbee D, Nichol K, Hoes A . Confounding by indication in non-experimental evaluation of vaccine effectiveness: the example of prevention of influenza complications. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002; 56(12):951-5. PMC: 1756997. DOI: 10.1136/jech.56.12.951. View