» Articles » PMID: 34095522

Challenges in Accessing Routinely Collected Data from Multiple Providers in the UK for Primary Studies: Managing the Morass

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Jun 7
PMID 34095522
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Researchers are increasingly using routinely collected data in addition to, or instead of, other data collection methods. The UK government continues to invest in research centres to encourage use of these data, and trials and cohort studies utilise data linkage methods in the follow-up of participants. This does not come without its limitations and challenges, such as data access delays.

Objective: This paper outlines the challenges faced by three projects utilising individual-level routinely-collected linked data for the longer-term follow-up of participants.

Methods: These studies are varied in design, study population and data providers. One researcher was common to the three studies and collated relevant study correspondence, formal documentary evidence such as data sharing agreements and, where relevant, meeting records to review. Key themes were identified and reviewed by other members of the research teams. Mitigating strategies were identified and discussed with a data provider representative and a broader group of researchers to finalise the recommendations presented.

Results: The challenges discussed are grouped into five themes: Data application process; Project timelines; Dependencies and considerations related to consent; Information Governance; Contractual. In presenting our results descriptively we summarise each case study, identify the main cross-cutting themes and consider the potential for mitigation of challenges.

Conclusions: We make recommendations that identify responsibilities for both researchers and data providers for mitigating and managing data access challenges. A continued conversation within the research community and with data providers is needed to continue to enable researchers to access and utilise the wealth of routinely-collected data available. The suggestions made in this paper will help researchers be better prepared to deal with the challenges of applying for data from multiple data providers.

Citing Articles

The Challenges and Lessons Learned Building a New UK Infrastructure for Finding and Accessing Population-Wide COVID-19 Data for Research and Public Health Analysis: The CO-CONNECT Project.

Jefferson E, Milligan G, Johnston J, Mumtaz S, Cole C, Best J J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e50235.

PMID: 39566065 PMC: 11618003. DOI: 10.2196/50235.


Predictive Data Analytics in Telecare and Telehealth: Systematic Scoping Review.

Anderson E, Lennon M, Kavanagh K, Weir N, Kernaghan D, Roper M Online J Public Health Inform. 2024; 16:e57618.

PMID: 39110501 PMC: 11339581. DOI: 10.2196/57618.


Now Is the Time to Strengthen Government-Academic Data Infrastructures to Jump-Start Future Public Health Crisis Response.

Lee J, Tyler A, Veinot T, Yakel E JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024; 10:e51880.

PMID: 38656780 PMC: 11079773. DOI: 10.2196/51880.


A DELPHI study priority setting the remaining challenges for the use of routinely collected data in trials: COMORANT-UK.

Williams A, Davies G, Farrin A, Mafham M, Robling M, Sydes M Trials. 2023; 24(1):243.

PMID: 36997954 PMC: 10064573. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07251-x.


Healthcare systems data in the context of clinical trials - A comparison of cardiovascular data from a clinical trial dataset with routinely collected data.

MacNair A, Nankivell M, Murray M, Rosen S, Appleyard S, Sydes M Contemp Clin Trials. 2023; 128():107162.

PMID: 36933612 PMC: 7617340. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107162.


References
1.
Connelly R, Playford C, Gayle V, Dibben C . The role of administrative data in the big data revolution in social science research. Soc Sci Res. 2016; 59:1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.04.015. View

2.
Lugg-Widger F, Cannings-John R, Channon S, Fitzsimmons D, Hood K, Jones K . Assessing the medium-term impact of a home-visiting programme on child maltreatment in England: protocol for a routine data linkage study. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(7):e015728. PMC: 5734359. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015728. View

3.
Raftery J, Roderick P, Stevens A . Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess. 2005; 9(20):1-92, iii-iv. DOI: 10.3310/hta9200. View

4.
Carter P, Laurie G, Dixon-Woods M . The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble. J Med Ethics. 2015; 41(5):404-9. PMC: 4431337. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102374. View

5.
Lewsey J, Leyland A, Murray G, Boddy F . Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 2000; 4(22):1-55. View