» Articles » PMID: 34093837

Network Meta-analysis Comparing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies in Solid Cancers

Overview
Journal J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Jun 7
PMID 34093837
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Multiple anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have been approved, and in some diseases, there is a choice of more than one. Comparative efficacy, safety and tolerability are unknown. Randomized trials (RCTs) supporting the registration of single agent anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 inhibitors between 2015-2019 were identified. We extracted the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and calculated the odds ratio (OR) for commonly reported safety and tolerability outcomes. We then performed a network meta-analysis, reporting multiple pair-wise comparisons between different anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Sixteen RCTs comprising 10673 patients were included; 10 in non-small-cell lung cancer, 2 in melanoma, 2 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and 2 in urothelial cancer. Compared to pembrolizumab, efficacy was similar for nivolumab (HR: 1.02 95% CI: 0.91-1.14) and for atezolizumab (HR: 0.97 95% CI: 0.85-1.10), however, avelumab appeared inferior (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06-1.56). Pembrolizumab showed similar odds of serious adverse events (SAEs) as nivolumab (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.56-2.27) and atezolizumab (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.55-2.04). Compared to nivolumab, atezolizumab was associated with more SAEs (OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.47-3.12). Avelumab had the lowest odds of grade 3-4 adverse events compared to pembrolizumab (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24-0.74), nivolumab (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.24-0.62) and atezolizumab (OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.14-0.33). The odds of treatment discontinuation without progression were similar between nivolumab and atezolizumab (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.73-2.00), and between pembrolizumab and nivolumab (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.83-2.17), but was higher with atezolizumab compared to nivolumab (OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.29-5.00). Pembrolizumab was associated with higher OR of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) compared to nivolumab (OR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.49-3.03) and atezolizumab (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.09-2.43). Pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and atezolizumab have similar efficacy. Avelumab appears less efficacious. Safety and tolerability seem better with avelumab, but worse with atezolizumab and pembrolizumab.

Citing Articles

Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Integrating Epidemiology, Immunology, and Therapeutic Updates.

Becker J, Stang A, Schrama D, Ugurel S Am J Clin Dermatol. 2024; 25(4):541-557.

PMID: 38649621 PMC: 11193695. DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00858-z.


Inflamed immune phenotype predicts favorable clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy across multiple cancer types.

Shen J, Choi Y, Lee T, Kim H, Chae Y, Dulken B J Immunother Cancer. 2024; 12(2).

PMID: 38355279 PMC: 10868175. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008339.


Avelumab for Advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Global Real-World Data on Patient Response and Survival.

Lohray R, Verma K, Wang L, Haynes D, Lewis D Pragmat Obs Res. 2023; 14:149-154.

PMID: 38021416 PMC: 10658947. DOI: 10.2147/POR.S398151.


Selection of a PD-1 blocking antibody from a novel fully human phage display library.

Peissert F, Pluss L, Giudice A, Ongaro T, Villa A, Elsayed A Protein Sci. 2022; 31(12):e4486.

PMID: 36317676 PMC: 9667898. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4486.


Drug Repurposing to Enhance Antitumor Response to PD-1/PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Thuru X, Magnez R, El-Bouazzati H, Vergoten G, Quesnel B, Bailly C Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(14).

PMID: 35884428 PMC: 9322126. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143368.


References
1.
Barlesi F, Vansteenkiste J, Spigel D, Ishii H, Garassino M, de Marinis F . Avelumab versus docetaxel in patients with platinum-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (JAVELIN Lung 200): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018; 19(11):1468-1479. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30673-9. View

2.
Lee H, Lee S, Heo Y . Molecular Interactions of Antibody Drugs Targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 in Immuno-Oncology. Molecules. 2019; 24(6). PMC: 6470598. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24061190. View

3.
Zak K, Grudnik P, Magiera K, Domling A, Dubin G, Holak T . Structural Biology of the Immune Checkpoint Receptor PD-1 and Its Ligands PD-L1/PD-L2. Structure. 2017; 25(8):1163-1174. DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2017.06.011. View

4.
Fessas P, Lee H, Ikemizu S, Janowitz T . A molecular and preclinical comparison of the PD-1-targeted T-cell checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Semin Oncol. 2017; 44(2):136-140. PMC: 5612055. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2017.06.002. View

5.
Huang Y, Xie W, Fan H, Du J . Comparative Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors for Cancer Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol. 2019; 9:972. PMC: 6779807. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00972. View