» Articles » PMID: 34092096

Correlation of Intravascular Ultrasound and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Patients With Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract

Background: There is great degree of interobserver variability in the visual angiographic assessment of left main coronary disease (LMCD). Fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound are often used in this setting. The use of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) for evaluation of LMCD has not been well studied. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of iFR in the assessment of angiographically intermediate LMCD.

Methods: This is an international multicenter retrospective observational study of patients who underwent both iFR and intravascular ultrasound evaluation for angiographically intermediate LMCD. An independent core laboratory performed blinded off-line analysis of all intravascular ultrasound data. A minimum lumen area of 6 mm2 was used as the cutoff for significant disease.

Results: One hundred twenty-five patients (mean age, 68.4±9.5 years, 84.8% male) were included in this analysis. Receiver operating curve analysis showed that an iFR of ≤0.89 identified minimum lumen area <6 mm2 with an area under the curve of 0.77 (77% sensitivity, 66% specificity; P<0.0001). Among the 69 patients without ostial left anterior descending artery or left circumflex artery disease, receiver operating curve analysis showed that an iFR of ≤0.89 identified minimum lumen area <6 mm2 with an area under the curve of 0.84 (70% sensitivity, 84% specificity; P<0.0001). The correlation was not significantly different when the body surface area was considered.

Conclusions: In this study, in patients with intermediate LMCD, iFR of ≤0.89 correlates with intravascular ultrasound minimum lumen area <6 mm2 regardless of body surface area. The current study supports the use of iFR for the evaluation of intermediate LMCD.

Citing Articles

State-of-the-art percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease in Japan.

Warisawa T, Sonoda S, Yamaji K, Amano T, Kohsaka S, Natsuaki M Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024; 39(4):386-402.

PMID: 39078544 DOI: 10.1007/s12928-024-01030-4.


Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve in evaluating of intermediate left main stenosis.

Sui Y, Yang C, Guan C, Xu Y, Wu N, Yang W J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024; 21(1):34-43.

PMID: 38440337 PMC: 10908580. DOI: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.01.003.

References
1.
Johnson T, Raber L, Di Mario C, Bourantas C, Jia H, Mattesini A . Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular.... Eur Heart J. 2019; 40(31):2566-2584. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz332. View

2.
Park S, Ahn J, Kang S, Yoon S, Koo B, Lee J . Intravascular ultrasound-derived minimal lumen area criteria for functionally significant left main coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7(8):868-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.015. View

3.
Nijjer S, de Waard G, Sen S, van de Hoef T, Petraco R, Echavarria-Pinto M . Coronary pressure and flow relationships in humans: phasic analysis of normal and pathological vessels and the implications for stenosis assessment: a report from the Iberian-Dutch-English (IDEAL) collaborators. Eur Heart J. 2015; 37(26):2069-80. PMC: 4940452. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv626. View

4.
Puri R, Kapadia S, Nicholls S, Harvey J, Kataoka Y, Tuzcu E . Optimizing outcomes during left main percutaneous coronary intervention with intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve: the current state of evidence. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5(7):697-707. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.02.018. View

5.
de la Torre Hernandez J, Hernandez F, Alfonso F, Rumoroso J, Lopez-Palop R, Sadaba M . Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58(4):351-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.064. View