» Articles » PMID: 34091873

Intraoperative Monitoring of the Obese Patient Undergoing Surgery: A Narrative Review

Overview
Journal Adv Ther
Date 2021 Jun 6
PMID 34091873
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the increasing prevalence of obesity in the population, anaesthetists must confidently manage both the pathophysiological and technical challenges presented in bariatric and non-bariatric surgery. The intraoperative period represents an important opportunity to optimise and mitigate risk. However, there is little formal guidance on what intraoperative monitoring techniques should be used in this population. This narrative review collates the existing evidence for intraoperative monitoring devices in the obese patients. Although a number of non-invasive blood pressure monitors have been tested, an invasive arterial line remains the most reliable monitor if accurate, continuous monitoring is required. Goal-directed fluid therapy is recommended by clinical practice guidelines, but the methods tested to assess this had guarded applicability to the obese population. Transcutaneous carbon dioxide (CO) monitoring may offer additional benefit to standard capnography in this population. Individually titrated positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment manoeuvres improved intraoperative mechanics but yielded no benefit in the immediate postoperative period. Depth of anaesthesia monitoring appears to be beneficial in the perioperative period regarding recovery times and complications. Objective confirmation of reversal of neuromuscular blockade continues to be a central tenet of anaesthesia practice, particularly relevant to this group who have been characterised as an "at risk" extubation group. Where deep neuromuscular blockade is used, continuous neuromuscular blockade is suggested. Both obesity and the intraoperative context represent somewhat unstable search terms, as the clinical implications of the obesity phenotype are not uniform, and the type and urgency of surgery have significant impact on the intraoperative setting. This renders the generation of summary conclusions around what intraoperative monitoring techniques are suitable in this population highly challenging.

Citing Articles

The Effect of Phonomyography Prototype for Intraoperative Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Preliminary Study.

Dong Y, Guo W, Yang Y, Li Q Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790354 PMC: 11117765. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050486.


The patient with obesity and super-super obesity: Perioperative anesthetic considerations.

Kaye A, Lingle B, Brothers J, Rodriguez J, Morris A, Greeson E Saudi J Anaesth. 2022; 16(3):332-338.

PMID: 35898529 PMC: 9311171. DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_235_22.

References
1.
Ortiz V, Kwo J . Obesity: physiologic changes and implications for preoperative management. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015; 15:97. PMC: 4491231. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-015-0079-8. View

2.
Eley V, Christensen R, Guy L, Dodd B . Perioperative Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients With Obesity. Anesth Analg. 2018; 128(3):484-491. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003647. View

3.
Anast N, Olejniczak M, Ingrande J, Brock-Utne J . The impact of blood pressure cuff location on the accuracy of noninvasive blood pressure measurements in obese patients: an observational study. Can J Anaesth. 2015; 63(3):298-306. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-015-0509-6. View

4.
Torensma B, Martini C, Boon M, Olofsen E, In t Veld B, Liem R . Deep Neuromuscular Block Improves Surgical Conditions during Bariatric Surgery and Reduces Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial. PLoS One. 2016; 11(12):e0167907. PMC: 5148011. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167907. View

5.
Nightingale C, Margarson M, Shearer E, Redman J, Lucas D, Cousins J . Peri-operative management of the obese surgical patient 2015: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland Society for Obesity and Bariatric Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2015; 70(7):859-76. PMC: 5029585. DOI: 10.1111/anae.13101. View