» Articles » PMID: 34090411

Comparison of Self-reported & Device-based, Measured Physical Activity Among Children in Germany

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Jun 6
PMID 34090411
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: As children show a more complex but less structured movement behavior than adults, assessment of their many spontaneous and impulsive movements is a challenge for physical activity (PA) assessment. Since neither questionnaires nor accelerometers enable optimal detection of all facets of PA, a multimodal, combined approach of self-reported and device-based methods is recommended. Based on the number of days on which the participants reached the physical activity (PA) values given in the WHO guideline, this study examines 1) the difference between self-reported and device-based, measured PA and 2) whether PA differences between age and gender groups obtained by two methods are comparable.

Methods: Participants aged 6-17 years were randomly chosen and data were collected representatively at 167 sample points throughout Germany within the Motorik-Modul Study. PA of n = 2694 participants (52.3% female) was measured using the ActiGraph accelerometer (ACC) and a physical activity questionnaire (PAQ). The sample was divided into three age groups (6-10 yrs. n = 788, 11-13 yrs. n = 823, 14-17 yrs. n = 1083). Numbers of days per week with at least 60 min moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) were analyzed for both methods.

Results: Only every 25th respondent (4%) reaches the WHO standard of 60 min MVPA every day if measured with ACC. Self-reported PA was slightly higher (9%) (mean = 3.82 days; mean = 2.34 days; F = 915.85; p = <.001; f = .64). The differences between the methods are significantly smaller in younger children than in the older age groups (F = 264.2, p < .001; f = .48). The older the subjects are, the lower is the proportion of those who meet the WHO guideline on each day, with girls meeting the guideline less frequently than boys in all age groups.

Conclusion: Children and adolescents living in Germany show a very low adherence to the WHO guideline on PA. While younger children are much more active with their free play, especially children over 10 years of age and especially girls should be the target of programs to increase PA.

Citing Articles

Attainment of World Health Organization physical activity recommendations by Ecuadorian children: Analysis of social and anthropometrics factors in two distinct populations.

Molina-Cando M, Chis Ster I, Escandon S, Sanchez R, Rodriguez A, Chico M PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0311165.

PMID: 39693299 PMC: 11654990. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311165.


DE-PASS Best Evidence Statement (BESt): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Effectiveness of Trials on Device-Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour and Their Determinants in Children Aged 5-12 Years.

Khudair M, Marcuzzi A, Tempest G, Ng K, Peric R, Bartos F Sports Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39643840 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-024-02136-8.


Primary school children's health and its association with physical fitness development and health-related factors.

Ruedl G, Cocca A, Wirnitzer K, Tanous D, Drenowatz C, Niedermeier M AIMS Public Health. 2024; 11(1):1-18.

PMID: 38617409 PMC: 11007415. DOI: 10.3934/publichealth.2024001.


Physical activity of older children and adolescents in Germany - Results of the HBSC study 2022 and trends since 2009/10.

Bucksch J, Mockel J, Kaman A, Sudeck G J Health Monit. 2024; 9(1):62-78.

PMID: 38559682 PMC: 10977466. DOI: 10.25646/11874.


Childhood and adolescence physical activity and multimorbidity later in life: A systematic review.

Souilla L, Larsen A, Juhl C, Skou S, Bricca A J Multimorb Comorb. 2024; 14:26335565241231403.

PMID: 38333053 PMC: 10851728. DOI: 10.1177/26335565241231403.


References
1.
Riddoch C, Andersen L, Wedderkopp N, Harro M, Klasson-Heggebo L, Sardinha L . Physical activity levels and patterns of 9- and 15-yr-old European children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(1):86-92. DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000106174.43932.92. View

2.
Corder K, van Sluijs E . Invited commentary: comparing physical activity across countries--current strengths and weaknesses. Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 171(10):1065-8. PMC: 3696728. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq068. View

3.
Schmidt S, Henn A, Albrecht C, Woll A . Physical Activity of German Children and Adolescents 2003-2012: The MoMo-Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(11). PMC: 5708014. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14111375. View

4.
Burchartz A, Manz K, Anedda B, Niessner C, Oriwol D, Schmidt S . Measurement of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior by Accelerometry Among a Nationwide Sample from the KiGGS and MoMo Study: Study Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020; 9(7):e14370. PMC: 7388053. DOI: 10.2196/14370. View

5.
Dyrstad S, Hansen B, Holme I, Anderssen S . Comparison of self-reported versus accelerometer-measured physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 46(1):99-106. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a0595f. View