» Articles » PMID: 34088911

Simulation-based Biomechanical Assessment of Unpowered Exoskeletons for Running

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Jun 5
PMID 34088911
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Due to the complexity and high degrees of freedom, the detailed assessment of human biomechanics is necessary for the design and optimization of an effective exoskeleton. In this paper, we present full kinematics, dynamics, and biomechanics assessment of unpowered exoskeleton augmentation for human running gait. To do so, the considered case study is the assistive torque profile of I-RUN. Our approach is using some extensive data-driven OpenSim simulation results employing a generic lower limb model with 92-muscles and 29-DOF. In the simulation, it is observed that exoskeleton augmentation leads to [Formula: see text] metabolic rate reduction for the stiffness coefficient of [Formula: see text]. Moreover, this optimum stiffness coefficient minimizes the biological hip moment by [Formula: see text]. The optimum stiffness coefficient ([Formula: see text]) also reduces the average force of four major hip muscles, i.e., Psoas, Gluteus Maximus, Rectus Femoris, and Semimembranosus. The effect of assistive torque profile on the muscles' fatigue is also studied. Interestingly, it is observed that at [Formula: see text], both all 92 lower limb muscles' fatigue and two hip major mono-articular muscles' fatigue have the maximum reduction. This result re-confirm our hypothesis that "reducing the forces of two antagonistic mono-articular muscles is sufficient for involved muscles' total fatigue reduction." Finally, the relation between the amount of metabolic rate reduction and kinematics of hip joint is examined carefully where for the first time, we present a reliable kinematic index for prediction of the metabolic rate reduction by I-RUN augmentation. This index not only explains individual differences in metabolic rate reduction but also provides a quantitative measure for training the subjects to maximize their benefits from I-RUN.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical models in the lower-limb exoskeletons development: a review.

Firouzi V, Seyfarth A, Song S, von Stryk O, Ahmad Sharbafi M J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):12.

PMID: 39856714 PMC: 11761726. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01556-5.


Application of Fuzzy Adaptive Impedance Control Based on Backstepping Method for PAM Elbow Exoskeleton in Rehabilitation.

Zhao Z, Hou X, Shan D, Liu H, Liu H, Hao L Polymers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39771383 PMC: 11679431. DOI: 10.3390/polym16243533.

References
1.
Horst F, Lapuschkin S, Samek W, Muller K, Schollhorn W . Explaining the unique nature of individual gait patterns with deep learning. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):2391. PMC: 6382912. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-38748-8. View

2.
Jackson R, Collins S . An experimental comparison of the relative benefits of work and torque assistance in ankle exoskeletons. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015; 119(5):541-57. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01133.2014. View

3.
Thelen D . Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. J Biomech Eng. 2003; 125(1):70-7. DOI: 10.1115/1.1531112. View

4.
Ding Y, Kim M, Kuindersma S, Walsh C . Human-in-the-loop optimization of hip assistance with a soft exosuit during walking. Sci Robot. 2020; 3(15). DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.aar5438. View

5.
Geyer H, Herr H . A muscle-reflex model that encodes principles of legged mechanics produces human walking dynamics and muscle activities. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010; 18(3):263-73. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2047592. View