» Articles » PMID: 34088520

Salvage Robot-assisted Renal Surgery for Local Recurrence After Surgical Resection or Renal Mass Ablation: Classification, Techniques, and Clinical Outcomes

Abstract

Background: Salvage treatment for local recurrence after prior partial nephrectomy (PN) or local tumor ablation (LTA) for kidney cancer is, as of yet, poorly investigated.

Objective: To classify the treatments and standardize the nomenclature of salvage robot-assisted renal surgery, to describe the surgical technique for each scenario, and to investigate complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Sixty-seven patients underwent salvage robot-assisted renal surgery from October 2010 to December 2020 at nine tertiary referral centers.

Surgical Procedure: Salvage robot-assisted renal surgery classified according to treatment type as salvage robot-assisted partial or radical nephrectomy (sRAPN or sRARN) and according to previous primary treatment (PN or LTA).

Measurements: Postoperative complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes were assessed.

Results And Limitations: A total of 32 and 35 patients underwent salvage robotic surgery following PN and LTA, respectively. After prior PN, two patients underwent sRAPN, while ten underwent sRARN for a metachronous recurrence in the same kidney. No intra- or perioperative complication occurred. For local recurrence in the resection bed, six patients underwent sRAPN, while 14 underwent sRARN. For sRAPN, the intraoperative complication rate was 33%; there was no postoperative complication. For sRARN, there was no intraoperative complication and the postoperative complication rate was 7%. At 3 yr, the local recurrence-free rates were 64% and 82% for sRAPN and sRARN, respectively, while the 3-yr metastasis-free rates were 80% and 79%, respectively. At 33 mo, the median estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were 57 and 45 ml/min/1.73 m for sRAPN and sRARN, respectively. After prior LTA, 35 patients underwent sRAPN and no patient underwent sRARN. There was no intraoperative complication; the overall postoperative complications rate was 20%. No local recurrence occurred. The 3-yr metastasis-free rate was 90%. At 43 mo, the median eGFR was 38 ml/min/1.73 m. The main limitations are the relatively small population and the noncomparative design of the study.

Conclusions: Salvage robot-assisted surgery has a safe complication profile in the hands of experienced surgeons at high-volume institutions, but the risk of local recurrence in this setting is non-negligible.

Patient Summary: Patients with local recurrence after partial nephrectomy or local tumor ablation should be aware that further treatment with robot-assisted surgery is not associated with a worrisome complication profile, but also that they are at risk of further recurrence.

Citing Articles

Trends in research on nanomedicine in urologic cancer: a bibliometric and visualized analysis.

Lan X, Feng M, Chen L, Zhang L, Han C, Wang Y Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):366.

PMID: 39179938 PMC: 11343939. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01249-w.


Ablative Treatments for Small Renal Masses and Management of Recurrences: A Comprehensive Review.

Aveta A, Iossa V, Spena G, Conforti P, Pagano G, Dinacci F Life (Basel). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38672721 PMC: 11050889. DOI: 10.3390/life14040450.


Robotic salvage partial nephrectomy following surgical and ablative therapies.

Feng C, Franco A, Ditonno F, Manfredi C, Chow A, Autorino R Int Braz J Urol. 2024; 50(3):373-374.

PMID: 38598832 PMC: 11152326. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0117.


A systematic review of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes for advanced indications: Large tumors (cT2-T3), solitary kidney, completely endophytic, hilar, recurrent, and multiple renal tumors.

Pandolfo S, Cerrato C, Wu Z, Franco A, Del Giudice F, Sciarra A Asian J Urol. 2023; 10(4):390-406.

PMID: 38024426 PMC: 10659988. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.06.001.


Redo Partial Nephrectomy for Local Recurrence After Previous Nephron-sparing Surgery. Surgical Insights and Oncologic Results from a High-volume Robotic Center.

Di Maida F, Grosso A, Campi R, Lambertini L, Gallo M, Cadenar A Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023; 57:84-90.

PMID: 37810278 PMC: 10551832. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.09.007.