Adolescents' Support for an Outdoor Smoke-free Policy at Sports Clubs in the Netherlands

Overview

Journal Tob Prev Cessat

Date 2021 Jun 4

PMID 34084979

Authors

Heike H Garritsen

Rein R Distelvelt

Ingri G Olsen

Ien A M van de Goor

Anton E Kunst

Andrea D Rozema

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Outdoor smoke-free policies (SFPs) at sports clubs may contribute to the prevention of smoking among adolescents. Adolescents' support for such policy is important to its success. The aim of this study is to explore adolescents' perceptions with regard to an outdoor SFP at sports clubs in the Netherlands.

Methods: Focus group discussions (n=27) were held with 180 participants (aged 13-18 years) at 16 sports clubs. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

Results: Participants generally supported an outdoor SFP at sports clubs. Five reasons for this support were reported: 1) children should not be exposed to smoking, 2) smoking and sports (clubs) do not fit together, 3) secondhand smoke is undesirable, 4) an outdoor SFP may enhance a sports club's image, and 5) an outdoor SFP contributes to the prevention of smoking. Some participants voiced considerations against an outdoor SFP, arguing amongst others, that smokers need to be taken into account, and that problems may occur with compliance and enforcement. Support for an outdoor SFP was stronger among participants at clubs with an outdoor SFP than among those without such policy.

Conclusions: This study shows that adolescents generally support an outdoor smoke-free policy at sports clubs. After implementation, the outdoor SFP was generally experienced as a normal practice. These results could encourage sports clubs without an outdoor SFP to become smoke-free as well.

References

Kruger J, Jama A, Kegler M, Marynak K, King B . National and State-Specific Attitudes toward Smoke-Free Parks among U.S. Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13(9). PMC: 5036697. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13090864. View

Schreuders M, Lagerweij N, van den Putte B, Kunst A . To what extent and why adolescents do or do not support future tobacco control measures: a multimethod study in the Netherlands. Tob Control. 2017; 27(5):596-599. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053770. View

Klein E, Forster J, McFadden B, Outley C . Minnesota tobacco-free park policies: attitudes of the general public and park officials. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007; 9 Suppl 1:S49-55. DOI: 10.1080/14622200601083467. View

Seitz C, Lawless J, Cahill S, O Brien A, Coady C, Regan C . The Adoption, Implementation, and Impact of Smoke-Free Policies among Gaelic Athletic Association Clubs in Ireland: A Qualitative Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(5). PMC: 7084469. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051785. View

Hocking B, Borland R, Owen N, Kemp G . A total ban on workplace smoking is acceptable and effective. J Occup Med. 1991; 33(2):163-7. View

Nuyts P, Kuipers M, Willemsen M, Kunst A . Trends in age of smoking initiation in the Netherlands: a shift towards older ages?. Addiction. 2017; 113(3):524-532. DOI: 10.1111/add.14057. View

Garritsen H, Rozema A, van de Goor I, Kunst A . Implementation of an outdoor smoke-free policy at sports clubs: Critical situations and determinants influencing implementation. Int J Drug Policy. 2021; 92:103129. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103129. View

Borland R, Yong H, Siahpush M, Hyland A, Campbell S, Hastings G . Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006; 15 Suppl 3:iii34-41. PMC: 2593054. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2004.008748. View

Hyland A, Higbee C, Borland R, Travers M, Hastings G, Fong G . Attitudes and beliefs about secondhand smoke and smoke-free policies in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009; 11(6):642-9. PMC: 2688606. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp063. View

10.

Turner K, Gordon J . Butt in, butt out: pupils' views on the extent to which staff could and should enforce smoking restrictions. Health Educ Res. 2004; 19(1):40-50. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyg005. View

11.

Wakefield M, Forster J . Growing evidence for new benefit of clean indoor air laws: reduced adolescent smoking. Tob Control. 2005; 14(5):292-3. PMC: 1748099. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2005.013557. View

12.

Gallus S, Rosato V, Zuccaro P, Pacifici R, Colombo P, Manzari M . Attitudes towards the extension of smoking restrictions to selected outdoor areas in Italy. Tob Control. 2011; 21(1):59-62. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2010.040774. View

13.

Thomson G, Wilson N, Edwards R . At the frontier of tobacco control: a brief review of public attitudes toward smoke-free outdoor places. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009; 11(6):584-90. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp046. View

14.

Alesci N, Forster J, Blaine T . Smoking visibility, perceived acceptability, and frequency in various locations among youth and adults. Prev Med. 2003; 36(3):272-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00029-4. View

15.

Eisenberg M, Forster J . Adolescent smoking behavior: measures of social norms. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 25(2):122-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00116-8. View

16.

Wiium N, Torsheim T, Wold B . Normative processes and adolescents' smoking behaviour in Norway: a multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 62(7):1810-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.029. View