» Articles » PMID: 34079901

Discovering Relationships Between OSDAs and Zeolites Through Data Mining and Generative Neural Networks

Overview
Journal ACS Cent Sci
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2021 Jun 3
PMID 34079901
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Organic structure directing agents (OSDAs) play a crucial role in the synthesis of micro- and mesoporous materials especially in the case of zeolites. Despite the wide use of OSDAs, their interaction with zeolite frameworks is poorly understood, with researchers relying on synthesis heuristics or computationally expensive techniques to predict whether an organic molecule can act as an OSDA for a certain zeolite. In this paper, we undertake a data-driven approach to unearth generalized OSDA-zeolite relationships using a comprehensive database comprising of 5,663 synthesis routes for porous materials. To generate this comprehensive database, we use natural language processing and text mining techniques to extract OSDAs, zeolite phases, and gel chemistry from the scientific literature published between 1966 and 2020. Through structural featurization of the OSDAs using weighted holistic invariant molecular (WHIM) descriptors, we relate OSDAs described in the literature to different types of cage-based, small-pore zeolites. Lastly, we adapt a generative neural network capable of suggesting new molecules as potential OSDAs for a given zeolite structure and gel chemistry. We apply this model to CHA and SFW zeolites generating several alternative OSDA candidates to those currently used in practice. These molecules are further vetted with molecular mechanics simulations to show the model generates physically meaningful predictions. Our model can automatically explore the OSDA space, reducing the amount of simulation or experimentation needed to find new OSDA candidates.

Citing Articles

Strength of London Dispersion Forces in Organic Structure Directing Agent-Zeolite Assemblies.

Ata K, Mineva T, Alonso B Molecules. 2024; 29(18).

PMID: 39339483 PMC: 11434474. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29184489.


ZeoSyn: A Comprehensive Zeolite Synthesis Dataset Enabling Machine-Learning Rationalization of Hydrothermal Parameters.

Pan E, Kwon S, Jensen Z, Xie M, Gomez-Bombarelli R, Moliner M ACS Cent Sci. 2024; 10(3):729-743.

PMID: 38559304 PMC: 10979502. DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.3c01615.


Latent Variable Machine Learning Framework for Catalysis: General Models, Transfer Learning, and Interpretability.

Kayode G, Montemore M JACS Au. 2024; 4(1):80-91.

PMID: 38274257 PMC: 10807004. DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00419.


Competition between Mononuclear and Binuclear Copper Sites across Different Zeolite Topologies.

Wijerathne A, Sawyer A, Daya R, Paolucci C JACS Au. 2024; 4(1):197-215.

PMID: 38274255 PMC: 10806779. DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00632.


A Comprehensive and Versatile Multimodal Deep-Learning Approach for Predicting Diverse Properties of Advanced Materials.

Muroga S, Miki Y, Hata K Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023; 10(24):e2302508.

PMID: 37357977 PMC: 10460884. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202302508.


References
1.
Wicker J, Cooper R . Beyond Rotatable Bond Counts: Capturing 3D Conformational Flexibility in a Single Descriptor. J Chem Inf Model. 2016; 56(12):2347-2352. PMC: 5271572. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00565. View

2.
Corma A, Rey F, Rius J, Sabater M, Valencia S . Supramolecular self-assembled molecules as organic directing agent for synthesis of zeolites. Nature. 2004; 431(7006):287-90. DOI: 10.1038/nature02909. View

3.
Shevlin S . Looking deeper into zeolites. Nat Mater. 2020; 19(10):1038-1039. DOI: 10.1038/s41563-020-0787-4. View

4.
Schwalbe-Koda D, Jensen Z, Olivetti E, Gomez-Bombarelli R . Graph similarity drives zeolite diffusionless transformations and intergrowth. Nat Mater. 2019; 18(11):1177-1181. DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0486-1. View

5.
Daeyaert F, Ye F, Deem M . Machine-learning approach to the design of OSDAs for zeolite beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(9):3413-3418. PMC: 6397530. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1818763116. View