» Articles » PMID: 34079812

Development and Validation of a Machine-Learning Model for Prediction of Extubation Failure in Intensive Care Units

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Jun 3
PMID 34079812
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Extubation failure (EF) can lead to an increased chance of ventilator-associated pneumonia, longer hospital stays, and a higher mortality rate. This study aimed to develop and validate an accurate machine-learning model to predict EF in intensive care units (ICUs). Patients who underwent extubation in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database were included. EF was defined as the need for ventilatory support (non-invasive ventilation or reintubation) or death within 48 h following extubation. A machine-learning model called Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) was developed based on 89 clinical and laboratory variables. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were calculated to evaluate feature importance and the recursive feature elimination (RFE) algorithm was used to select key features. Hyperparameter optimization was conducted using an automated machine-learning toolkit (Neural Network Intelligence). The final model was trained based on key features and compared with 10 other models. The model was then prospectively validated in patients enrolled in the Cardiac Surgical ICU of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. In addition, a web-based tool was developed to help clinicians use our model. Of 16,189 patients included in the MIMIC-IV cohort, 2,756 (17.0%) had EF. Nineteen key features were selected using the RFE algorithm, including age, body mass index, stroke, heart rate, respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, temperature, pH, central venous pressure, tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, mean airway pressure, pressure support ventilation (PSV) level, mechanical ventilation (MV) durations, spontaneous breathing trial success times, urine output, crystalloid amount, and antibiotic types. After hyperparameter optimization, our model had the greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC: 0.835) in internal validation. Significant differences in mortality, reintubation rates, and NIV rates were shown between patients with a high predicted risk and those with a low predicted risk. In the prospective validation, the superiority of our model was also observed (AUROC: 0.803). According to the SHAP values, MV duration and PSV level were the most important features for prediction. In conclusion, this study developed and prospectively validated a CatBoost model, which better predicted EF in ICUs than other models.

Citing Articles

Utilization of non-invasive ventilation before prehospital emergency anesthesia in trauma - a cohort analysis with machine learning.

Luckscheiter A, Thiel M, Zink W, Eisenberger J, Viergutz T, Schneider-Lindner V Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025; 33(1):35.

PMID: 40033329 PMC: 11877787. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-025-01350-1.


Machine learning to predict extubation success using the spontaneous breathing trial, objective cough measurement, and diaphragmatic contraction velocity: Secondary analysis of the COBRE-US trial.

Varon-Vega F, Tuta-Quintero E, Maldonado-Franco A, Robayo-Amortegui H, Giraldo-Cadavid L, Botero-Rosas D J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2025; 11(1):70-77.

PMID: 40017472 PMC: 11864070. DOI: 10.2478/jccm-2025-0009.


Predicting Agitation-Sedation Levels in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Development of an Ensemble Model.

Dai P, Lin P, Sheu R, Liu S, Wu Y, Wu C JMIR Med Inform. 2025; 13:e63601.

PMID: 40009778 PMC: 11882103. DOI: 10.2196/63601.


Enhancing machine learning performance in cardiac surgery ICU: Hyperparameter optimization with metaheuristic algorithm.

Bahrami A, Rakhshaninejad M, Ghousi R, Atashi A PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0311250.

PMID: 39928609 PMC: 11809875. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311250.


Transitions in intensive care: Investigating critical slowing down post extubation.

Khalil L, George S, Brown K, Ray S, Arridge S PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317211.

PMID: 39854305 PMC: 11760018. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317211.


References
1.
Zhang Z . Multiple imputation with multivariate imputation by chained equation (MICE) package. Ann Transl Med. 2016; 4(2):30. PMC: 4731595. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.12.63. View

2.
Schmidt G, Girard T, Kress J, Morris P, Ouellette D, Alhazzani W . Official Executive Summary of an American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline: Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 195(1):115-119. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2076ST. View

3.
Brochard L, Rauss A, Benito S, Conti G, Mancebo J, Rekik N . Comparison of three methods of gradual withdrawal from ventilatory support during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994; 150(4):896-903. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.4.7921460. View

4.
Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. View

5.
Maezawa S, Kudo D, Miyagawa N, Yamanouchi S, Kushimoto S . Association of Body Weight Change and Fluid Balance With Extubation Failure in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Single-Center Observational Study. J Intensive Care Med. 2019; 36(2):175-181. DOI: 10.1177/0885066619887694. View