Interleukin-2 PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Before and During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy
Overview
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors can induce a T cell-mediated anti-tumor immune response in patients with melanoma. Visualizing T cell activity using positron emission tomography (PET) might allow early insight into treatment efficacy. Activated tumor-infiltrating T cells express the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R). Therefore, we performed a pilot study, using fluorine-18-labeled IL-2 ([F]FB-IL2 PET), to evaluate whether a treatment-induced immune response can be detected.
Methods: Patients with metastatic melanoma received ~ 200 MBq [F]FB-IL2 intravenously, followed by a PET/CT scan before and during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. [F]FB-IL2 uptake was measured as standardized uptake value in healthy tissues (SUV) and tumor lesions (SUV). Response to therapy was assessed using RECIST v1.1. Archival tumor tissues were used for immunohistochemical analyses of T cell infiltration.
Results: Baseline [F]FB-IL2 PET scans were performed in 13 patients. SUV at baseline was highest in the kidneys (14.2, IQR: 11.6-18.0) and liver (10.6, IQR: 8.6-13.4). In lymphoid tissues, uptake was highest in spleen (10.9, IQR: 8.8-12.4) and bone marrow (2.5, IQR: 2.1-3.0). SUV in tumor lesions (n = 41) at baseline was 1.9 (IQR: 1.7-2.3). In 11 patients, serial imaging was performed, three at week 6, seven at week 2, and one at week 4. Median [F]FB-IL2 tumor uptake decreased from 1.8 (IQR: 1.7-2.1) at baseline to 1.7 (IQR: 1.4-2.1) during treatment (p = 0.043). Changes in [F]FB-IL2 tumor uptake did not correlate with response. IL-2R expression in four archival tumor tissues was low and did not correlate with baseline [F]FB-IL2 uptake. No [F]FB-IL2-related side effects occurred.
Conclusion: PET imaging of the IL-2R, using [F]FB-IL2, is safe and feasible. In this small patient group, serial [F]FB-IL2-PET imaging did not detect a treatment-related immune response.
Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov : NCT02922283; EudraCT: 2014-003387.20.
Martin S, Wendlinger L, Zitti B, Hicham M, Postupalenko V, Marx L EJNMMI Res. 2024; 14(1):77.
PMID: 39196448 PMC: 11358572. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-024-01142-1.
Illuminating immunotherapy response via precision T cell-targeted PET imaging.
Glazer S, Kummar S, Mittra E Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1233913.
PMID: 39104861 PMC: 11298440. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1233913.
The role of CD8 PET imaging in guiding cancer immunotherapy.
Zhang J, Du B, Wang Y, Cui Y, Wang S, Zhao Y Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1428541.
PMID: 39072335 PMC: 11272484. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1428541.
Interferon gamma immunoPET imaging to evaluate response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Hackett J, Ramos N, Barr S, Bross M, Viola N, Gibson H Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1285117.
PMID: 38130991 PMC: 10735274. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1285117.
Current and potential roles of immuno-PET/-SPECT in CAR T-cell therapy.
Mulgaonkar A, Udayakumar D, Yang Y, Harris S, Oz O, Ramakrishnan Geethakumari P Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1199146.
PMID: 37441689 PMC: 10333708. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1199146.