Cultural Adaptation and Validation of an Instrument About Nursing Critical Thinking Skills
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: to validate the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire regarding cultural aspects and metric properties.
Methods: a methodological research carried out through cross-cultural adaptation, face and content validity, dimensional construct and known groups validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency. 511 nurses from four hospitals participated in the study, of which 54 participated in retest.
Results: the instrument validation for Brazilian Portuguese maintained equivalences, according to the original version. The dimensional validity demonstrated adjustment to the tetrafactorial structure of the original version (GFI=0.69). There were statistically significant differences in critical thinking skills between nurses with graduate degrees and who undertook training, reading articles, developing research and working in an institution with a longer time implementation of the Nursing Process. The instrument showed temporal stability (ICC 073-0.84; p<0.001) and adequate internal consistency (α=0.97).
Conclusions: the instrument proved to be valid and reliable for the studied population.
Benito-Aracil L, Bonilla-Aguilar I, Alonso-Fernandez S, Zuriguel-Perez E, Falco-Pegueroles A, Delgado-Hito P Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7026.
PMID: 40016295 PMC: 11868445. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90161-6.
Clinical supervision strategies, learning, and critical thinking of nursing students.
Silva A, Carvalho A, Vieira R, Pinto C Rev Bras Enferm. 2023; 76(4):e20220691.
PMID: 37820150 PMC: 10561938. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0691.