» Articles » PMID: 34072458

A Case Study on the Behavioural Effect of Positive Reinforcement Training in a Novel Task Participation Test in Göttingen Mini Pigs

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2021 Jun 2
PMID 34072458
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In laboratory animal research, many procedures will be stressful for the animals, as they are forced to participate. Training animals to cooperate using clicker training (CT) or luring (LU) may reduce stress levels, and thereby increase animal welfare. In zoo animals, aquarium animals, and pets, CT is used to train animals to cooperate during medical procedures, whereas in experimental research, LU seem to be the preferred training method. This descriptive case study aims to present the behaviour of CT and LU pigs in a potentially fear-evoking behavioural test-the novel task participation test-in which the pigs walked a short runway on a novel walking surface. All eight pigs voluntarily participated, and only one LU pig showed body stretching combined with lack of tail wagging indicating reduced welfare. All CT pigs and one LU pig displayed tail wagging during the test, indicating a positive mental state. Hence, training pigs to cooperate during experimental procedures resulted in a smooth completion of the task with no signs of fear or anxiety in seven out of eight animals. We suggest that training laboratory pigs prior to experimental procedures or tests should be done to ensure low stress levels.

Citing Articles

A Positive-Reinforcement Training Regimen for Refined Sample Collection in Laboratory Pigs.

Layton R, Beggs D, Fisher A, Mansell P, Riddell S, Layton D Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 40002952 PMC: 11851642. DOI: 10.3390/ani15040471.


Blood Sampling in Göttingen Minipigs-A Case Study of Two Standard Methods and Clicker Training as a Restraint-Free Alternative.

Schioler K, Jensen M, Sorensen D Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39943177 PMC: 11816219. DOI: 10.3390/ani15030407.


Clicker Training in Minipigs to Reduce Stress during Blood Collection-An Example of Applied Refinement.

Fiderer D, Thoene-Reineke C, Wiegard M Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39409768 PMC: 11475955. DOI: 10.3390/ani14192819.


Behavioral responses to artificial insemination and the effect of positive reinforcement training.

Heinsius J, von Keyserlingk M, Weary D PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0310537.

PMID: 39388492 PMC: 11466390. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310537.


Why workshops work: Examining the efficacy of training trainers to train goats.

Meier J, Theby V, Gygax L, Hillman E, Fischer-Tenhagen C Anim Welf. 2024; 32:e76.

PMID: 38516208 PMC: 10955182. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2023.94.


References
1.
Havranek M, Bolliger B, Roos S, Pryce C, Quednow B, Seifritz E . Uncontrollable and unpredictable stress interacts with subclinical depression and anxiety scores in determining anxiety response. Stress. 2015; 19(1):53-62. DOI: 10.3109/10253890.2015.1117449. View

2.
Russow L . Ethical implications of the human-animal bond in the laboratory. ILAR J. 2001; 43(1):33-7. DOI: 10.1093/ilar.43.1.33. View

3.
Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen M, Moe R, Spruijt B, Keeling L . Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol Behav. 2007; 92(3):375-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003. View

4.
Pfaller-Sadovsky N, Hurtado-Parrado C, Cardillo D, Medina L, Friedman S . What's in a Click? The Efficacy of Conditioned Reinforcement in Applied Animal Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(10). PMC: 7600771. DOI: 10.3390/ani10101757. View

5.
Silk J . Animal Behaviour: Friendship Enhances Trust in Chimpanzees. Curr Biol. 2016; 26(2):R76-R78. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.030. View