» Articles » PMID: 34072225

Usefulness of a Colonoscopy Cap with an External Grid for the Measurement of Small-Sized Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Jun 2
PMID 34072225
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accurate measurement of polyp size during colonoscopy is crucial. The usefulness of cap-assisted colonoscopy and external grid application on monitor (gCAP) was evaluated for polyp size measurement in this 3-year, single-center, single-blind, randomized trial. Using the endoscopic forceps width as reference, the discrepancy percent (DP), error rate (ER), and measurement time were compared between gCAP and visual estimation (VE) after randomization. ER was calculated within a 20% and 33% limit. From the 111 patients, 280 polyps were measured. The mean polyp sizes were 4.0 ± 1.7 mm and 4.2 ± 1.8 mm with gCAP and VE, respectively ( = 0.368). Compared with that by the forceps method, DP was significantly lower in the gCAP group than in the VE group. Moreover, ER was significantly lower in the gCAP group within its preset limit. The measurement time was 4 s longer in the gCAP group than in the VE group (8.2 ± 4.8 s vs. 4.2 ± 1.5 s; < 0.001). However, the forceps method lasted 28 s longer than the others. On subgroup analysis by size, gCAP was more accurate for polyp size ≥ 5 mm. The gCAP method was more accurate for polyp size measurement than VE, especially for polyps ≥ 5 mm, and was more convenient than the forceps method.

Citing Articles

Polyp size measurement during colonoscopy using a virtual scale: variability and systematic differences.

van Bokhorst Q, Houwen B, Hazewinkel Y, van der Vlugt M, Beaumont H, Grootjans J Endoscopy. 2024; 57(2):137-145.

PMID: 39043201 PMC: 11774581. DOI: 10.1055/a-2371-3693.


The role of cap-assisted endoscopy and its future implications.

Kim S, Lee B Clin Endosc. 2024; 57(3):293-301.

PMID: 38807361 PMC: 11133983. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2023.051.


Enhancing endoscopic measurement: validating a quantitative method for polyp size and location estimation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Safavian N, Toh S, Pani M, Lee R Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(5):2505-2514.

PMID: 38467860 PMC: 11078852. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10758-2.


Endoscopic measurement of the size of gastrointestinal polyps using an electromagnetic tracking system and computer vision-based algorithm.

Safavian N, Toh S, Pani M, Lee R Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023; 19(2):321-329.

PMID: 37596379 PMC: 10838828. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-023-03011-z.

References
1.
Visentini-Scarzanella M, Kawasaki H, Furukawa R, Bonino M, Arolfo S, Lo Secco G . A structured light laser probe for gastrointestinal polyp size measurement: a preliminary comparative study. Endosc Int Open. 2018; 6(5):E602-E609. PMC: 5943691. DOI: 10.1055/a-0577-2798. View

2.
Eichenseer P, Dhanekula R, Jakate S, Mobarhan S, Melson J . Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013; 56(3):315-21. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826dd138. View

3.
Rex D, Rabinovitz R . Variable interpretation of polyp size by using open forceps by experienced colonoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 79(3):402-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.030. View

4.
Schoen R, Gerber L, Margulies C . The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 46(6):492-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70002-6. View

5.
Buijs M, Steele R, Buch N, Kolbro T, Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Kobaek-Larsen M . Reproducibility and accuracy of visual estimation of polyp size in large colorectal polyps. Acta Oncol. 2019; 58(sup1):S37-S41. DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1588990. View