» Articles » PMID: 34071616

Increasing the Awareness of Animal Welfare Science in Marine Mammal Conservation: Addressing Language, Translation and Reception Issues

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2021 Jun 2
PMID 34071616
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Integrating welfare principles into conservation strategy is an emerging synthesis that encourages consideration of individual animals' quality of life in research, policies and law. However, these principles have gained limited traction in marine compared to terrestrial animal conservation. This manuscript investigates several factors that may be contributing to this disparity. In order to gauge current understanding of animal welfare science principles by marine mammal researchers and other stakeholders, a "Welfare in the Wild" workshop was convened at the 32nd European Cetacean Society conference (La Spezia, Italy, April 2018). The workshop was attended by 30 participants who completed pre- and post-workshop surveys on animal welfare principles. The survey results highlight a range of different views about exactly what animal welfare science is and how it can be applied to marine mammals. Specifically, participants' definitions appeared to vary depending on the type of employment or research they engaged in, indicating a need for an interdisciplinary common language. Secondly, we analysed the peer-reviewed literature in order to ascertain where marine mammal publications exploring welfare were being published. From 1950 to July 2020, a total of 299 articles featured both marine mammal taxa (one or more) and the word in the title, abstract or keywords. This represents just 0.96% of the total peer-reviewed published papers on marine mammal taxa ( = 31,221) during the same period. When examining articles published within "Welfare and Ethics" ( = 6133) and "Aquatic-focused" ( = 139,352) journals, just 1.2% ( = 71) and 0.04% ( = 57) of articles, respectively, featured the word welfare when examining marine mammals. With the aim of exploring how explicitly including welfare evaluations in marine mammal research and management can benefit conservation outcomes, we framed our workshop and quantitative literature review findings to provide practical solutions to the language, translation and reception issues of this burgeoning cross-disciplinary collaboration.

Citing Articles

Expert assessment of the impact of ship-strikes on cetacean welfare using the Welfare Assessment Tool for Wild Cetaceans.

Rae F, Nicol C, Simmonds M Anim Welf. 2024; 32:e18.

PMID: 38487413 PMC: 10936308. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2023.7.


Skin Cortisol and Acoustic Activity: Potential Tools to Evaluate Stress and Welfare in Captive Cetaceans.

Wong C, Tsai M, Ko F, Wang J, Xue Y, Yang W Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37174558 PMC: 10177183. DOI: 10.3390/ani13091521.


Identification of potential welfare and survival indicators for stranded cetaceans through international, interdisciplinary expert opinion.

Boys R, Beausoleil N, Pawley M, Littlewood K, Betty E, Stockin K R Soc Open Sci. 2022; 9(10):220646.

PMID: 36312566 PMC: 9554527. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.220646.


Evaluating Potential Cetacean Welfare Indicators from Video of Live Stranded Long-Finned Pilot Whales ().

Boys R, Beausoleil N, Pawley M, Betty E, Stockin K Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(14).

PMID: 35883407 PMC: 9312325. DOI: 10.3390/ani12141861.

References
1.
Nicol C, Bejder L, Green L, Johnson C, Keeling L, Noren D . Anthropogenic Threats to Wild Cetacean Welfare and a Tool to Inform Policy in This Area. Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7:57. PMC: 7058697. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00057. View

2.
Atkinson S, Crocker D, Houser D, Mashburn K . Stress physiology in marine mammals: how well do they fit the terrestrial model?. J Comp Physiol B. 2015; 185(5):463-86. DOI: 10.1007/s00360-015-0901-0. View

3.
Brakes P . Sociality and Wild Animal Welfare: Future Directions. Front Vet Sci. 2019; 6:62. PMC: 6433960. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00062. View

4.
Jordan B . Science-based assessment of animal welfare: wild and captive animals. Rev Sci Tech. 2005; 24(2):515-28. DOI: 10.20506/rst.24.2.1588. View

5.
Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen M, Moe R, Spruijt B, Keeling L . Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol Behav. 2007; 92(3):375-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003. View