Modulation of Cellular Response to Different Parameters of the Rotating Magnetic Field (RMF)-An In Vitro Wound Healing Study

Overview

Journal Int J Mol Sci

Publisher MDPI

Specialties Biochemistry
Chemistry
Molecular Biology

Date 2021 Jun 2

PMID 34071384

Citations 5

Authors

Magdalena Jedrzejczak-Silicka

Marian Kordas

Maciej Konopacki

Rafal Rakoczy

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Since the effect of MFs (magnetic fields) on various biological systems has been studied, different results have been obtained from an insignificant effect of weak MFs on the disruption of the circadian clock system. On the other hand, magnetic fields, electromagnetic fields, or electric fields are used in medicine. The presented study was conducted to determine whether a low-frequency RMF (rotating magnetic field) with different field parameters could evoke the cellular response in vitro and is possible to modulate the cellular response. The cellular metabolic activity, ROS and Ca concentration levels, wound healing assay, and gene expression analyses were conducted to evaluate the effect of RMF. It was shown that different values of magnetic induction () and frequency () of RMF evoke a different response of cells, e.g., increase in the general metabolic activity may be associated with the increasing of ROS levels. The lower intracellular Ca concentration (for 50 Hz) evoked the inability of cells to wound closure. It can be stated that the subtle balance in the ROS level is crucial in the wound for the effective healing process, and it is possible to modulate the cellular response to the RMF in the context of an in vitro wound healing.

Citing Articles

Safety of Exposure to 0.2 T and 4 Hz Rotating Magnetic Field: A Ten-Month Study on C57BL/6 Mice.

Yang H, Han Y, Zhou C, Nie S, Li M, Yu Q Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024; 46(7):6390-6406.

PMID: 39057024 PMC: 11275342. DOI: 10.3390/cimb46070382.

Application of magnetism in tissue regeneration: recent progress and future prospects.

Guan W, Gao H, Liu Y, Sun S, Li G Regen Biomater. 2024; 11:rbae048.

PMID: 38939044 PMC: 11208728. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae048.

Rotating magnetic field improved cognitive and memory impairments in a sporadic ad model of mice by regulating microglial polarization.

Li M, Yu Q, Anayyat U, Yang H, Wei Y, Wang X Geroscience. 2024; 46(6):6229-6256.

PMID: 38904930 PMC: 11493917. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01223-y.

Advances and applications of biomimetic biomaterials for endogenous skin regeneration.

Wang M, Hong Y, Fu X, Sun X Bioact Mater. 2024; 39:492-520.

PMID: 38883311 PMC: 11179177. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.04.011.

The Effect of a Rotating Magnetic Field on the Regenerative Potential of Platelets.

Cecerska-Heryc E, Goszka M, Glizniewicz M, Grygorcewicz B, Serwin N, Stodolak P Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(7).

PMID: 38612456 PMC: 11012199. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25073644.

References

Chamchoy K, Pakotiprapha D, Pumirat P, Leartsakulpanich U, Boonyuen U . Application of WST-8 based colorimetric NAD(P)H detection for quantitative dehydrogenase assays. BMC Biochem. 2019; 20(1):4. PMC: 6454709. DOI: 10.1186/s12858-019-0108-1. View

Xu M, Lv J, Wang P, Yanxia Liao , Li Y, Zhao W . Vascular endothelial Cdc42 deficiency delays skin wound-healing processes by increasing IL-1β and TNF-α expression. Am J Transl Res. 2019; 11(1):257-268. PMC: 6357328. View

Rusak A, Rybak Z . [Does magnetic stimulation affect wound healing? In vitro studies]. Polim Med. 2014; 43(3):147-52. View

Liu L, Liu Z, Huang L, Sun Z, Ma T, Zhu S . Pulsed magnetic field promotes proliferation and neurotrophic genes expression in Schwann cells in vitro. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015; 8(3):2343-53. PMC: 4440050. View

Pfaffl M . A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29(9):e45. PMC: 55695. DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45. View

Vanderstraeten J, Verschaeve L, Burda H, Bouland C, de Brouwer C . Health effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields: reconsidering the melatonin hypothesis in the light of current data on magnetoreception. J Appl Toxicol. 2012; 32(12):952-8. DOI: 10.1002/jat.2761. View

Juutilainen J, Herrala M, Luukkonen J, Naarala J, Hore P . Magnetocarcinogenesis: is there a mechanism for carcinogenic effects of weak magnetic fields?. Proc Biol Sci. 2018; 285(1879). PMC: 5998098. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0590. View

Hunt R, Zavalin A, Bhatnagar A, Chinnasamy S, Das K . Electromagnetic biostimulation of living cultures for biotechnology, biofuel and bioenergy applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2010; 10(10):4515-4558. PMC: 2790121. DOI: 10.3390/ijms10104515. View

DiPersio C . Double duty for Rac1 in epidermal wound healing. Sci STKE. 2007; 2007(391):pe33. DOI: 10.1126/stke.3912007pe33. View

10.

Wang H, Zhang X . Magnetic Fields and Reactive Oxygen Species. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18(10). PMC: 5666856. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18102175. View

11.

Novoselova E, Novikov V, Lunin S, Glushkova O, Novoselova T, Parfenyuk S . Effects of low-level combined static and weak low-frequency alternating magnetic fields on cytokine production and tumor development in mice. Electromagn Biol Med. 2018; 38(1):74-83. DOI: 10.1080/15368378.2018.1545667. View

12.

Boukamp P, Petrussevska R, Breitkreutz D, Hornung J, Markham A, Fusenig N . Normal keratinization in a spontaneously immortalized aneuploid human keratinocyte cell line. J Cell Biol. 1988; 106(3):761-71. PMC: 2115116. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.106.3.761. View

13.

Buchachenko A, Kuznetsov D, Breslavskaya N . Ion-radical mechanism of enzymatic ATP synthesis: DFT calculations and experimental control. J Phys Chem B. 2010; 114(6):2287-92. DOI: 10.1021/jp909992z. View

14.

Amara S, Douki T, Ravanat J, Garrel C, Guiraud P, Favier A . Influence of a static magnetic field (250 mT) on the antioxidant response and DNA integrity in THP1 cells. Phys Med Biol. 2007; 52(4):889-98. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/4/002. View

15.

Bustin S, Benes V, Garson J, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M . The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009; 55(4):611-22. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797. View

16.

Tatarov I, Panda A, Petkov D, Kolappaswamy K, Thompson K, Kavirayani A . Effect of magnetic fields on tumor growth and viability. Comp Med. 2012; 61(4):339-45. PMC: 3155400. View

17.

Akoglu H . User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018; 18(3):91-93. PMC: 6107969. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001. View

18.

Stadelmann W, Digenis A, Tobin G . Physiology and healing dynamics of chronic cutaneous wounds. Am J Surg. 1998; 176(2A Suppl):26S-38S. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00183-4. View

19.

Crotty D, Silkstone G, Poddar S, Ranson R, Prina-Mello A, Wilson M . Reexamination of magnetic isotope and field effects on adenosine triphosphate production by creatine kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 109(5):1437-42. PMC: 3277194. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1117840108. View

20.

Ozturk B, Durak Z, Buber S, Kocaoglu E . Effect of Static Magnetic Field on Oxidant/Antioxidant Parameters in Cancerous and Noncancerous Human Gastric Tissues. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016; 2016:8608462. PMC: 4904108. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8608462. View