» Articles » PMID: 34070638

The Quality of Life and Satisfaction with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Therapy in Children Under 7 Years of Age with T1D Using the RtCGM System Integrated with Insulin Pump-A Caregivers Point of View

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2021 Jun 2
PMID 34070638
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Quality of life (QoL) is an important parameter that affects the choice of therapy. Assessment of QoL and satisfaction with therapy using the rtCGM in children with T1D aged < 7 years was conducted. The study group consisted of 38 children with T1D aged < 7 years (34% aged 2-4, 66% aged 5-7 years), HbA1c: 6.53 ± 0.63%, duration of diabetes: 2.6 ± 1.6 years, treated with an rtCGM-augmented insulin pump for 1.92 ± 1.15 years. Two anonymous surveys were conducted: a. PedsQL3.0 diabetes standardized questionnaire-QoL assessment among age groups: 2-4/5-7 years. b. An original survey assessing the CGM use satisfaction. The mean scores in PedsQL3.0: communication 75%, worries 30%, treatment 70%, and problems associated with diabetes 65%. The QoL scale is: 0-19% very low, 20-39% low, 40-59% moderate, 60-79% high, 80-100% very high. The most frequently reported concerns were long-term diabetes complications and prick pain. Satisfaction with CGM use was high (68% in group aged 5-7 and 92% 2-4 years). Twenty-seven (71%) caregivers confirmed the positive effect of CGM on sleep. During the use of rtCGM a high quality of life was reported, and the quality of sleep in their caregivers was increased.

Citing Articles

Discordance between Glucose Management Indicator and Glycated Hemoglobin in a Pediatric Cohort with Type 1 Diabetes: A Real-World Study.

Foti Randazzese S, Bombaci B, Costantino S, Giorgianni Y, Lombardo F, Salzano G Children (Basel). 2024; 11(2).

PMID: 38397323 PMC: 10887365. DOI: 10.3390/children11020210.


Current Technologies for Managing Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Their Impact on Quality of Life-A Narrative Review.

Elian V, Popovici V, Ozon E, Musuc A, Fita A, Rusu E Life (Basel). 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37629520 PMC: 10456000. DOI: 10.3390/life13081663.


Continuous glucose monitoring empowers adolescents to take responsibility of diabetes management.

Williams L, Deacon E, van Rensburg E, Segal D Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2023; 15(1):e1-e6.

PMID: 37042539 PMC: 10157418. DOI: 10.4102/phcfm.v15i1.3879.


Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study.

Hochfellner D, Simic A, Taucher M, Sailer L, Kopanz J, Pottler T Biosensors (Basel). 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35200366 PMC: 8869704. DOI: 10.3390/bios12020106.

References
1.
Deiss D, Hartmann R, Hoeffe J, Kordonouri O . Assessment of glycemic control by continuous glucose monitoring system in 50 children with type 1 diabetes starting on insulin pump therapy. Pediatr Diabetes. 2004; 5(3):117-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-543X.2004.00053.x. View

2.
Rodbard D . Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Recent Studies Demonstrating Improved Glycemic Outcomes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017; 19(S3):S25-S37. PMC: 5467105. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2017.0035. View

3.
Battelino T, Conget I, Olsen B, Schutz-Fuhrmann I, Hommel E, Hoogma R . The use and efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2012; 55(12):3155-62. PMC: 3483098. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-012-2708-9. View

4.
Streisand R, Monaghan M . Young children with type 1 diabetes: challenges, research, and future directions. Curr Diab Rep. 2014; 14(9):520. PMC: 4113115. DOI: 10.1007/s11892-014-0520-2. View

5.
New J, Ajjan R, Pfeiffer A, Freckmann G . Continuous glucose monitoring in people with diabetes: the randomized controlled Glucose Level Awareness in Diabetes Study (GLADIS). Diabet Med. 2015; 32(5):609-17. DOI: 10.1111/dme.12713. View