» Articles » PMID: 34069901

Combined Effect of Activated Carbon Particles and Non-Adsorptive Spherical Beads As Fluidized Media on Fouling, Organic Removal and Microbial Communities in Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor

Overview
Date 2021 Jun 2
PMID 34069901
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The combined effect of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) spherical beads and granular activated carbon (GAC) particles as fluidized media on the performance of anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor (AFMBR) was investigated. GAC particles and ABS beads were fluidized together in a single AFMBR to investigate membrane fouling and organic removal efficiency as well as energy consumption. The density difference between these two similarly sized media caused the stratified bed layer where ABS beads are fluidized above the GAC along the membrane. Membrane relaxation was effective to reduce the fouling and trans-membrane pressure (TMP) below 0.25 bar could be achieved at 6 h of hydraulic retention time (HRT). More than 90% of soluble chemical oxygen demand (SCOD) was removed after 80 d operation. Biogas consisting of 65% of methane was produced by AFMBR, suggesting that combined use of GAC and ABS beads did not have any adverse effect on methane production during the operational period. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) examinations showed the adherence of microbes to both media. However, 16S rRNA results revealed that fewer microbes attached to ABS beads than GAC. There were also compositional differences between the ABS and GAC microbial communities. The abundance of the syntrophs and exoelectrogens population on ABS beads was relatively low compared to that of GAC. Our result implied that syntrophic synergy and possible occurrence of direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) might be facilitated in AFMBR by GAC, while traditional methanogenic pathways were dominant in ABS beads. The electrical energy required was 0.02 kWh/m, and it was only about 13% of that produced by AFMBR.

References
1.
Siembida B, Cornel P, Krause S, Zimmermann B . Effect of mechanical cleaning with granular material on the permeability of submerged membranes in the MBR process. Water Res. 2010; 44(14):4037-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.05.016. View

2.
Lovley D . Syntrophy Goes Electric: Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2017; 71:643-664. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-micro-030117-020420. View

3.
Aslam M, McCarty P, Shin C, Bae J, Kim J . Low energy single-staged anaerobic fluidized bed ceramic membrane bioreactor (AFCMBR) for wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2017; 240:33-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.017. View

4.
Desrousseaux C, Cueff R, Aumeran C, Garrait G, Mailhot-Jensen B, Traore O . Fabrication of Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Nanostructures with Anodic Alumina Oxide Templates, Characterization and Biofilm Development Test for Staphylococcus epidermidis. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0135632. PMC: 4540414. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135632. View

5.
Lee E, Rout P, Shin C, Bae J . Effects of sodium hypochlorite concentration on the methanogenic activity in an anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 678:85-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.396. View