Assessment of the Foot's Longitudinal Arch by Different Indicators and Their Correlation with the Foot Loading Paradigm in School-Aged Children: A Cross Sectional Study

Overview

Journal Int J Environ Res Public Health

Publisher MDPI

Specialties Environmental Health
Public Health

Date 2021 Jun 2

PMID 34068373

Citations 3

Authors

Beata Szczepanowska-Wolowiec

Paulina Sztandera

Ireneusz Kotela

Marek Zak

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: There are numerous studies assessing the morphological structure of the foot, but there is a notable scarcity of those focused on juxtaposing various longitudinal arch indices with foot loading paradigm. The present study aimed to determine the overall reliability, diagnostic accuracy of respective variables, and their correlation with the foot loading paradigm.

Methods: The study group consisted of 336 children, aged 10-15 years (girls 49.1% and boys 50.9%). The morphological structure of the plantar part of the foot in static conditions was assessed with the aid of a 2D podoscan. Individual foot loading paradigm in static conditions was assessed making use of the FreeMed platform.

Results: Staheli (SI), Chippaux-Smirak (CSI), and Sztriter-Godunow (KY) indices were strongly correlated with each other (ρ > 0.84, < 0.001). Own research corroborated an increased pressure of hollow feet, as assessed by the SI, CSI, and KY indices, on the forefoot and the hindfoot, foot zones B, E, F; these correlations being statistically significant. The results yielded by the present study also indicate an increased pressure on the metatarsal, and foot zones C, D of the flat feet.

Conclusions: Flatfootedness is not believed to be a common deformity among children and adolescents. The SI, CSI, and KY indices were found to be strongly correlated, as well as proved reliable in assessing the foot's longitudinal arch.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of Functional Re-Education as a Treatment for Infantile Flexible Flatfoot: Systematic Review.

Molina-Garcia C, Banwell G, Alvarez-Salvago F, Reinoso-Cobo A, Pujol-Fuentes C, Medina-Luque J Children (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39857838 PMC: 11763734. DOI: 10.3390/children12010008.

Does Lower-Limb Tendon Structure Influence Walking Gait?.

Nunez-Trull A, Alvarez-Medina J, Jaen-Carrillo D, Rubio-Peiroten A, Abat F, Roche-Seruendo L Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(24).

PMID: 38132032 PMC: 10742778. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11243142.

A deep learning method for foot-type classification using plantar pressure images.

Zhao Y, Zhou J, Qiu F, Liao X, Jiang J, Chen H Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1239246.

PMID: 37767108 PMC: 10519788. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1239246.

Risk Factors of Flatfoot in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Xu L, Gu H, Zhang Y, Sun T, Yu J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(14).

PMID: 35886097 PMC: 9319536. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148247.

References

Glowacka-Mrotek I, Sowa M, Nowikiewicz T, Siedlecki Z, Hagner W, Zegarski W . Foot posture in female patients 5 years after breast-conserving surgery: a case-control study. Breast Cancer. 2018; 25(3):325-333. PMC: 5906506. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-018-0835-y. View

Szczepanowska-Wolowiec B, Sztandera P, Kotela I, Zak M . Body weight-dependent foot loads, assessed in terms of BMI and adiposity, in school-aged children: a cross sectional study. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):12360. PMC: 7378067. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69420-1. View

Banwell H, Paris M, Mackintosh S, Williams C . Paediatric flexible flat foot: how are we measuring it and are we getting it right? A systematic review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018; 11:21. PMC: 5975578. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-018-0264-3. View

Garcia-Pinillos F, Jaen-Carrillo D, Latorre-Roman P, Escalona-Marfil C, Soto-Hermoso V, Lago-Fuentes C . Does Arch Stiffness Influence Running Spatiotemporal Parameters? An Analysis of the Relationship between Influencing Factors on Running Performance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(5). PMC: 7967574. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052437. View

Sadeghi-Demneh E, Jafarian F, Melvin J, Azadinia F, Shamsi F, Jafarpishe M . Flatfoot in school-age children: prevalence and associated factors. Foot Ankle Spec. 2015; 8(3):186-93. DOI: 10.1177/1938640015578520. View

Abich Y, Mihiret T, Akalu T, Gashaw M, Janakiraman B . Flatfoot and associated factors among Ethiopian school children aged 11 to 15 years: A school-based study. PLoS One. 2020; 15(8):e0238001. PMC: 7447044. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238001. View

Wozniacka R, Oleksy L, Jankowicz-Szymanska A, Mika A, Kielnar R, Stolarczyk A . The association between high-arched feet, plantar pressure distribution and body posture in young women. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):17187. PMC: 6868125. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53459-w. View

Tashiro Y, Fukumoto T, Uritani D, Matsumoto D, Nishiguchi S, Fukutani N . Children with flat feet have weaker toe grip strength than those having a normal arch. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015; 27(11):3533-6. PMC: 4681939. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.3533. View

Zuil-Escobar J, Martinez-Cepa C, Martin-Urrialde J, Gomez-Conesa A . Reliability and Accuracy of Static Parameters Obtained From Ink and Pressure Platform Footprints. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016; 39(7):510-517. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.07.005. View

10.

Wozniacka R, Bac A, Matusik S, Szczygiel E, Ciszek E . Body weight and the medial longitudinal foot arch: high-arched foot, a hidden problem?. Eur J Pediatr. 2013; 172(5):683-91. PMC: 3631513. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-013-1943-5. View

11.

Buldt A, Forghany S, Landorf K, Levinger P, Murley G, Menz H . Foot posture is associated with plantar pressure during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet. Gait Posture. 2018; 62:235-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.005. View

12.

Puszczalowska-Lizis E . The relevance choice of indexes to foot structure evaluation in the light of factors analysis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2012; 14(1):61-70. DOI: 10.5604/15093492.976902. View

13.

Bogut I, Popovic Z, Tomac Z, Matijevic V, Radmilovic G . PREVALENCE OF FOOT DEFORMITIES IN YOUNG SCHOOLCHILDREN IN SLAVONIA. Acta Clin Croat. 2019; 58(2):288-294. PMC: 6884386. DOI: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.02.12. View

14.

Dzieciol Z, Kuryliszyn-Moskal A, Dzieciol J . Application of plantography examination to the assessment of foot deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Med Sci. 2015; 11(5):1015-20. PMC: 4624746. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2015.54856. View

15.

Lee J, Kim K, Jeong J, Kwon N, Jeong S . Correlation of foot posture index with plantar pressure and radiographic measurements in pediatric flatfoot. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015; 39(1):10-7. PMC: 4351479. DOI: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.1.10. View

16.

Demirbuken I, Ozgul B, Timurtas E, Yurdalan S, Cekin M, Polat M . Gender and age impact on plantar pressure distribution in early adolescence. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019; 53(3):215-220. PMC: 6599390. DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.01.006. View

17.

Brzezinski M, Czubek Z, Niedzielska A, Jankowski M, Kobus T, Ossowski Z . Relationship between lower-extremity defects and body mass among polish children: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20(1):84. PMC: 6504130. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2460-0. View

18.

Catan L, Cerbu S, Amaricai E, Suciu O, Horhat D, Popoiu C . Assessment of Static Plantar Pressure, Stabilometry, Vitamin D and Bone Mineral Density in Female Adolescents with Moderate Idiopathic Scoliosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(6). PMC: 7143889. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17062167. View

19.

Chang J, Wang S, Kuo C, Shen H, Hong Y, Lin L . Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender, and age. Eur J Pediatr. 2009; 169(4):447-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-009-1050-9. View

20.

Zukauskas S, Barauskas V, cekanauskas E . Comparison of multiple flatfoot indicators in 5-8-year-old children. Open Med (Wars). 2021; 16(1):246-256. PMC: 7885299. DOI: 10.1515/med-2021-0227. View