» Articles » PMID: 34066829

A Narrative Review of Factors Historically Influencing Telehealth Use Across Six Medical Specialties in the United States

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Jun 2
PMID 34066829
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, studies in the US have identified wide variations in telehealth use across medical specialties. This is an intriguing problem, because the US has historically lacked a standardized set of telehealth coverage and reimbursement policies, which has posed a barrier to telehealth use across all specialties. Although all medical specialties in the US have been affected by these (policy-level) barriers, some specialties have been able to integrate telehealth use into mainstream practice, while others are just gaining momentum with telehealth during COVID-19. Although the temporary removal of policy (coverage) restrictions during the pandemic has accelerated telehealth use, uncertainties remain regarding future telehealth sustainability. Since (policy-level) factors by themselves do not serve to explain the variation in telehealth use across specialties, it would be important to examine (organizational-level) and (individual-level) factors historically influencing telehealth use across specialties, to understand underlying reasons for variation and identify implications for widespread sustainability. This paper draws upon the existing literature to develop a conceptual framework on factors influencing telehealth use within a medical specialty. The framework is then used to guide a narrative review of the telehealth literature across six medical specialties, including three specialties with lower telehealth use (allergy-immunology, family medicine, gastroenterology) and three with higher telehealth use (psychiatry, cardiology, radiology) in the US, in order to synthesize themes and gain insights into barriers and facilitators to telehealth use. In doing so, this review addresses a gap in the literature and provides a foundation for future research. Importantly, it helps to identify implications for ensuring widespread sustainability of telehealth use in the post-pandemic future.

Citing Articles

Integrating the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Tensions into a Novel Conceptual Model for Telehealth Advancement in Healthcare Organizations.

Schweidenback J, Rangachari P, DAmato-Palumbo S, Gladstone J J Healthc Leadersh. 2024; 16:501-510.

PMID: 39629022 PMC: 11613697. DOI: 10.2147/JHL.S497875.


Statistical Analysis of Telehealth Use and Pre- and Postpandemic Insurance Coverage in Selected Health Care Specialties in a Large Health Care System in Arkansas: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

Cengil A, Eksioglu S, Eksioglu B, Eswaran H, Hayes C, Bogulski C J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e49190.

PMID: 39423000 PMC: 11530737. DOI: 10.2196/49190.


"Brain Fog" After COVID-19 Infection: How the Field of Neuropsychology Can Help Clear the Air.

Widmann C, Henkel C, Seibert S Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024; 1458():59-76.

PMID: 39102190 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-61943-4_5.


Determinants of Telemedicine Service Use Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Neumann A, Konig H, Hajek A JMIR Aging. 2024; 7:e50938.

PMID: 38654578 PMC: 11063582. DOI: 10.2196/50938.


Exploring the Use of Mobile Health for the Rehabilitation of Long COVID Patients: A Scoping Review.

Daniels K, Mourad J, Bonnechere B Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38391826 PMC: 10887561. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12040451.


References
1.
Huntzinger M, Bielefeldt K . Expanding the Scope of Telemedicine in Gastroenterology. Fed Pract. 2019; 35(8):26-31. PMC: 6263446. View

2.
Mongelli F, Georgakopoulos P, Pato M . Challenges and Opportunities to Meet the Mental Health Needs of Underserved and Disenfranchised Populations in the United States. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2020; 18(1):16-24. PMC: 7011222. DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190028. View

3.
Schwamm L . Telehealth: seven strategies to successfully implement disruptive technology and transform health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014; 33(2):200-6. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1021. View

4.
MacKinnon G, Brittain E . Mobile Health Technologies in Cardiopulmonary Disease. Chest. 2019; 157(3):654-664. PMC: 7078586. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.015. View

5.
Christie H, Bartels S, Boots L, Tange H, Verhey F, de Vugt M . A systematic review on the implementation of eHealth interventions for informal caregivers of people with dementia. Internet Interv. 2018; 13:51-59. PMC: 6112102. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.07.002. View