» Articles » PMID: 34065345

Mechanisms of TP53 Pathway Inactivation in Embryonic and Somatic Cells-Relevance for Understanding (Germ Cell) Tumorigenesis

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Jun 2
PMID 34065345
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The P53 pathway is the most important cellular pathway to maintain genomic and cellular integrity, both in embryonic and non-embryonic cells. Stress signals induce its activation, initiating autophagy or cell cycle arrest to enable DNA repair. The persistence of these signals causes either senescence or apoptosis. Over 50% of all solid tumors harbor mutations in that inactivate the pathway. The remaining cancers are suggested to harbor mutations in genes that regulate the P53 pathway such as its inhibitors Mouse Double Minute 2 and 4 (MDM2 and MDM4, respectively). Many reviews have already been dedicated to P53, MDM2, and MDM4, while this review additionally focuses on the other factors that can deregulate P53 signaling. We discuss that P14 (ARF) functions as a negative regulator of MDM2, explaining the frequent loss of ARF detected in cancers. The long non-coding RNA Antisense Non-coding RNA in the Locus (ANRIL) is encoded on the same locus as , inhibiting ARF expression, thus contributing to the process of tumorigenesis. Mutations in tripartite motif (TRIM) proteins deregulate P53 signaling through their ubiquitin ligase activity. Several microRNAs (miRNAs) inactivate the P53 pathway through inhibition of translation. CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) maintains an open chromatin structure at the locus, explaining its inactivation of CTCF during tumorigenesis. P21, a downstream effector of P53, has been found to be deregulated in different tumor types. This review provides a comprehensive overview of these factors that are known to deregulate the P53 pathway in both somatic and embryonic cells, as well as their malignant counterparts (i.e., somatic and germ cell tumors). It provides insights into which aspects still need to be unraveled to grasp their contribution to tumorigenesis, putatively leading to novel targets for effective cancer therapies.

Citing Articles

Prognostic implications of ERLncRNAs in ccRCC: a novel risk score model and its association with tumor mutation burden and immune microenvironment.

Feng K, Li J, Li J, Li Z, Li Y Discov Oncol. 2025; 16(1):225.

PMID: 39985635 PMC: 11846825. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-01870-3.


TP53 mutations and MDM2 polymorphisms in breast and ovarian cancers: amelioration by drugs and natural compounds.

Chakraborty R, Dutta A, Mukhopadhyay R Clin Transl Oncol. 2025; .

PMID: 39797946 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03841-6.


Multiomics integration and machine learning reveal prognostic programmed cell death signatures in gastric cancer.

Bai Z, Wang H, Han J, An J, Yang Z, Mo X Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31060.

PMID: 39730893 PMC: 11680692. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82233-w.


A Mendelian randomisation approach to explore genetic factors associated with erectile dysfunction based on pooled genomic data.

Mao H, Li J, Ren F, Xu B, Tan W, Wang J Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2024; 12(5):266-278.

PMID: 39584007 PMC: 11578775. DOI: 10.62347/GENV7771.


Emerging role and therapeutic implications of p53 in intervertebral disc degeneration.

Wang Y, Hu S, Zhang W, Zhang B, Yang Z Cell Death Discov. 2023; 9(1):433.

PMID: 38040675 PMC: 10692240. DOI: 10.1038/s41420-023-01730-5.


References
1.
Rutkowski R, Hofmann K, Gartner A . Phylogeny and function of the invertebrate p53 superfamily. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010; 2(7):a001131. PMC: 2890203. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001131. View

2.
Georgakilas A, Martin O, Bonner W . p21: A Two-Faced Genome Guardian. Trends Mol Med. 2017; 23(4):310-319. DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2017.02.001. View

3.
Burger H, Nooter K, Boersma A, Kortland C, Stoter G . Lack of correlation between cisplatin-induced apoptosis, p53 status and expression of Bcl-2 family proteins in testicular germ cell tumour cell lines. Int J Cancer. 1997; 73(4):592-9. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19971114)73:4<592::aid-ijc22>3.0.co;2-a. View

4.
Dou Q, Levin A, Zhao S, Pardee A . Cyclin E and cyclin A as candidates for the restriction point protein. Cancer Res. 1993; 53(7):1493-7. View

5.
Chen H, Tian Y, Shu W, Bo X, Wang S . Comprehensive identification and annotation of cell type-specific and ubiquitous CTCF-binding sites in the human genome. PLoS One. 2012; 7(7):e41374. PMC: 3400636. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041374. View