Use of the Er:YAG Laser in Conservative Dentistry: Evaluation of the Microbial Population in Carious Lesions

Overview

Journal Materials (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Date 2021 Jun 2

PMID 34064339

Citations 18

Authors

Chiara Valenti

Stefano Pagano

Silvia Bozza

Enrico Ciurnella

Giuseppe Lomurno

Benito Capobianco

Maddalena Coniglio

Stefano Cianetti

Lorella Marinucci

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the Erbium:Yttrio-Aluminum-Granate (Er:YAG) laser photothermal and mechanical effects on cariogenic species concentration and on the microbial load composition of therapeutic cavities, in order to evaluate the possible micro-organisms reduction and make a comparison with manual and rotating conventional therapy (CT). A clinical trial was designed, including adults with active deep carious lesions on permanent teeth who were divided into two groups, i.e., control group and intervention group treated with CT and Er:YAG therapy, respectively. Before and after any conservative treatment, two oral samples were collected using a small sterile microbrush scrubbed within the base of the dentinal cavity tissue. The percentage of reduction and the colony-forming units (CFUs) count after Er:YAG and conventional treatments were compared for total microorganisms, including spp., spp., and spp. The microbial reduction varied from 90.2% to 100% and was significantly observed for total microorganisms and spp. ( < 0.05). The Er:YAG laser shows the potential for clinical applications, especially with paediatric and complicated patients, thanks to its minimally invasive properties and its effect on the reduction of microbial load.

Citing Articles

Cariogenic Microbiota and Emerging Antibacterial Materials to Combat Dental Caries: A Literature Review.

Cao J, Ma Q, Shi J, Wang X, Ye D, Liang J Pathogens. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40005488 PMC: 11858515. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens14020111.

Regional Epidemiological Study on the Dental Status of the First Permanent Molar in Romanian Schoolchildren.

Beresescu L, Beresescu G, Esian D, Vlasa A, Benedek C, Sabau R Dent J (Basel). 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39851602 PMC: 11763367. DOI: 10.3390/dj13010026.

Polycaprolactone in Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review of Innovations in Scaffold Fabrication and Surface Modifications.

Liang H, Lee W, Hsu J, Shih J, Ma T, Vo T J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(9).

PMID: 39330219 PMC: 11433047. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15090243.

Global trends in research on aging associated with periodontitis from 2002 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis.

Liu X, Li H Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1374027.

PMID: 38800469 PMC: 11116588. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1374027.

Clinical Comparative Study of Shade Measurement Using Two Methods: Dental Guides and Spectrophotometry.

Alvarado-Lorenzo A, Criado-Perez L, Cano-Rosas M, Lozano-Garcia E, Lopez-Palafox J, Alvarado-Lorenzo M Biomedicines. 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38672180 PMC: 11048452. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040825.

References

Guven Y, Aktoren O . Shear bond strength and ultrastructural interface analysis of different adhesive systems to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. Lasers Med Sci. 2013; 30(2):769-78. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-013-1424-0. View

Cecchini R, Zezell D, de Oliveira E, de Freitas P, Eduardo C . Effect of Er:YAG laser on enamel acid resistance: morphological and atomic spectrometry analysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2005; 37(5):366-72. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20247. View

. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017; 390(10100):1211-1259. PMC: 5605509. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. View

Bowen W, Burne R, Wu H, Koo H . Oral Biofilms: Pathogens, Matrix, and Polymicrobial Interactions in Microenvironments. Trends Microbiol. 2017; 26(3):229-242. PMC: 5834367. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.008. View

Al-Maliky M, Frentzen M, Meister J . Laser-assisted prevention of enamel caries: a 10-year review of the literature. Lasers Med Sci. 2019; 35(1):13-30. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-019-02859-5. View

Li T, Zhang X, Shi H, Ma Z, Lv B, Xie M . Er:YAG laser application in caries removal and cavity preparation in children: a meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2018; 34(2):273-280. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-018-2582-x. View

Evans D, Matthews S, Pitts N, Longbottom C, Nugent Z . A clinical evaluation of an Erbium:YAG laser for dental cavity preparation. Br Dent J. 2000; 188(12):677-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800575. View

Pagano S, Lombardo G, Orso M, Abraha I, Capobianco B, Cianetti S . Lasers to prevent dental caries: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(10):e038638. PMC: 7594354. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038638. View

Apel C, Birker L, Meister J, Weiss C, Gutknecht N . The caries-preventive potential of subablative Er:YAG and Er:YSGG laser radiation in an intraoral model: a pilot study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004; 22(4):312-7. DOI: 10.1089/pho.2004.22.312. View

10.

Bowen W . Dental caries - not just holes in teeth! A perspective. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2015; 31(3):228-33. DOI: 10.1111/omi.12132. View

11.

Raj S, Agarwal M, Aradhya K, Konde S, Nagakishore V . Evaluation of Dental Fear in Children during Dental Visit using Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014; 6(1):12-5. PMC: 4034641. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1178. View

12.

Moynihan P, Kelly S . Effect on caries of restricting sugars intake: systematic review to inform WHO guidelines. J Dent Res. 2013; 93(1):8-18. PMC: 3872848. DOI: 10.1177/0022034513508954. View

13.

Cebe F, Bulbul M, Simsek I, Cebe M, Ozturk B . Effect of Erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet laser on bond strength of a total-etch adhesive system to caries-affected dentin on gingival wall. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017; 20(6):734-740. DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.181321. View

14.

Gurgan S, Kiremitci A, Cakir F, Yazici E, Gorucu J, Gutknecht N . Shear bond strength of composite bonded to erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser-prepared dentin. Lasers Med Sci. 2007; 24(1):117-22. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-007-0532-0. View

15.

Cvar J, Ryge G . Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig. 2005; 9(4):215-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-005-0018-z. View

16.

Chen M, Ding J, He Y, Chen Y, Jiang Q . Effect of pretreatment on Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin. Lasers Med Sci. 2013; 30(2):753-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-013-1415-1. View

17.

Schwass D, Leichter J, Purton D, Swain M . Evaluating the efficiency of caries removal using an Er:YAG laser driven by fluorescence feedback control. Arch Oral Biol. 2012; 58(6):603-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.09.017. View

18.

Krause F, Braun A, Lotz G, Kneist S, Jepsen S, Eberhard J . Evaluation of selective caries removal in deciduous teeth by a fluorescence feedback-controlled Er:YAG laser in vivo. Clin Oral Investig. 2008; 12(3):209-15. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-007-0169-1. View

19.

Kidd E, Beighton D . Microbiological validation of assessments of caries activity during cavity preparation. Caries Res. 1993; 27(5):402-8. DOI: 10.1159/000261571. View

20.

Hemadi A, Huang R, Zhou Y, Zou J . Salivary proteins and microbiota as biomarkers for early childhood caries risk assessment. Int J Oral Sci. 2017; 9(11):e1. PMC: 5775330. DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2017.35. View