» Articles » PMID: 34064213

An Evaluation of the Properties of Urethane Dimethacrylate-Based Dental Resins

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Jun 2
PMID 34064213
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most of the dental materials available on the market are still based on traditional monomers such as bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA), urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA), triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), and ethoxylated bisphenol-A dimethacrylate (Bis-EMA). The interactions that arise in the monomer mixture and the characteristics of the resulting polymer network are the most important factors, which define the final properties of dental materials. The use of three different monomers in proper proportions may create a strong polymer matrix. In this paper, fourteen resin materials, based on urethane dimethacrylate with different co-monomers such as Bis-GMA or Bis-EMA, were evaluated. TEGDMA was used as the diluting monomer. The flexural strength (FS), diametral tensile strength (DTS), and hardness (HV) were determined. The impacts of material composition on the water absorption and dissolution were evaluated as well. The highest FS was 89.5 MPa, while the lowest was 69.7 MPa. The median DTS for the tested materials was found to range from 20 to 30 MPa. The hardness of the tested materials ranged from 14 to 16 HV. UDMA/TEGDMA matrices were characterized by the highest adsorption values. The overall results indicated that changes in the materials' properties are not strictly proportional to the material's compositional changes. The matrices showed good properties when the composite contained an equal mixture of Bis-GMA/Bis-EMA and UDMA or the content of the UDMA monomer was higher.

Citing Articles

Proposal of a Modular Classification System for Direct Dental Resin Composites Based on Clinical Applications.

Francois P, Izart M, Fasham T, Smail Y, Jannot M, Le Goff S Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40076058 PMC: 11902481. DOI: 10.3390/polym17050564.


Mechanical properties of modern restorative "bioactive" dental materials - an in vitro study.

Radwanski M, Zmyslowska-Polakowska E, Osica K, Krasowski M, Sauro S, Hardan L Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3552.

PMID: 39875486 PMC: 11775110. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86595-7.


The Impact of an MDP-Containing Primer on the Properties of Zinc Oxide Networks Infiltrated with BisGMA-TEGDMA and UDMA-TEGDMA Polymers.

Wellhausser B, Saure L, Schutt F, Scherer F, Wille S, Kern M Materials (Basel). 2025; 18(1.

PMID: 39795782 PMC: 11721492. DOI: 10.3390/ma18010137.


Synergistic effects of bacteria, enzymes, and cyclic mechanical stresses on the bond strength of composite restorations.

Montoya C, Babariya M, Ogwo C, Querido W, Patel J, Melo M Biomater Adv. 2024; 166:214049.

PMID: 39368439 PMC: 11560555. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214049.


Evaluation of Biocomposite Cements for Bone Defect Repair in Rat Models.

Ardelean A, Marza S, Marica R, Dragomir M, Rusu-Moldovan A, Moldovan M Life (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39337881 PMC: 11432940. DOI: 10.3390/life14091097.


References
1.
Barszczewska-Rybarek I, Chroszcz M, Chladek G . Novel Urethane-Dimethacrylate Monomers and Compositions for Use as Matrices in Dental Restorative Materials. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(7). PMC: 7177826. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21072644. View

2.
Penn R, Craig R, Tesk J . Diametral tensile strength and dental composites. Dent Mater. 1987; 3(1):46-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(87)80062-3. View

3.
Goncalves F, Pfeifer C, Stansbury J, Newman S, Braga R . Influence of matrix composition on polymerization stress development of experimental composites. Dent Mater. 2010; 26(7):697-703. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.014. View

4.
de Oliveira D, Rovaris K, Hass V, Souza-Junior E, Haiter-Neto F, Sinhoreti M . Effect of low shrinkage monomers on physicochemical properties of dental resin composites. Braz Dent J. 2015; 26(3):272-6. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201300401. View

5.
Putzeys E, De Nys S, cokic S, Duca R, Vanoirbeek J, Godderis L . Long-term elution of monomers from resin-based dental composites. Dent Mater. 2019; 35(3):477-485. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.005. View