» Articles » PMID: 34062220

End-of-Life Planning Depends on Socio-Economic and Racial Background: Evidence from the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS)

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2021 Jun 1
PMID 34062220
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Americans express a strong preference for participating in decisions regarding their medical care, yet they are often unable to participate in decision-making regarding their end-of-life care.

Objective: To examine determinants of end-of-life planning; including, the effect of an individual's ageing and dying process, health status and socio-economic and racial/ethnic background.

Methods: US observational cohort study, using data from the Health and Retirement Study (1992 - 2014) including 37,494 individuals. Random-effects logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between the presence of a living will and a range of individual time-varying characteristics, including time to death, and several time-invariant characteristics.

Results: End-of-life planning depends on several patient characteristics and circumstances, with socio-economic and racial/ethnic background having the largest effects. The probability of having a living will rises sharply late in life, as we would expect, and is further modified by the patient's proximity to death. The dying process, exerts a stronger influence on end-of-life planning than does the aging.

Conclusions: Understanding differences that increase end-of-life planning is important to incentivize patients' participation. Advance planning should be encouraged and accessible to people of all ages as it is inevitable for the provision of patient-centered and cost-effective care.

Citing Articles

Effect of ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation on uptake of renal supportive care and dialysis decision-making in older adults.

Rosenberg K, Burns A, Caplin B Clin Kidney J. 2023; 16(11):2164-2173.

PMID: 37915922 PMC: 10616494. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad108.


The Mapping of Influencing Factors in the Decision-Making of End-of-Life Care Patients: A Systematic Scoping Review.

da Silva M, Corradi-Perini C Indian J Palliat Care. 2023; 29(3):234-242.

PMID: 37700891 PMC: 10493695. DOI: 10.25259/IJPC_292_2022.


The Association of Chinese Ethnicity and Language Preference with Advance Directive Completion Among Older Patients in an Integrated Health System.

Oh D, Conell C, Lyon L, Ramalingam N, Virk L, Gonzalez R J Gen Intern Med. 2022; 38(5):1137-1142.

PMID: 36357725 PMC: 10110817. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07911-9.

References
1.
Gupta A, Jin G, Reich A, Prigerson H, Ladin K, Kim D . Association of Billed Advance Care Planning with End-of-Life Care Intensity for 2017 Medicare Decedents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020; 68(9):1947-1953. PMC: 8559724. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16683. View

2.
Kagawa-Singer M, Blackhall L . Negotiating cross-cultural issues at the end of life: "You got to go where he lives". JAMA. 2001; 286(23):2993-3001. DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.23.2993. View

3.
Mack J, Weeks J, Wright A, Block S, Prigerson H . End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(7):1203-8. PMC: 2834470. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4672. View

4.
Silveira M, Wiitala W, Piette J . Advance directive completion by elderly Americans: a decade of change. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014; 62(4):706-10. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12736. View

5.
Morrison R . Advance Directives/Care Planning: Clear, Simple, and Wrong. J Palliat Med. 2020; 23(7):878-879. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0272. View