» Articles » PMID: 34061762

Exploring the Constituent Elements of a Successful Mobile Health Intervention for Prediabetic Patients in King Saud University Medical City Hospitals in Saudi Arabia: Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal JMIR Form Res
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2021 Jun 1
PMID 34061762
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Self-management of prediabetic patients is crucial since they are at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Mobile health (mHealth) apps could contribute to potentially reducing the burden of diabetes by supporting the self-management of prediabetic patients.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the constituent elements of a successful mHealth intervention for prediabetic patients in King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC) hospitals in Saudi Arabia using the Centre for eHealth Research (CeHRes) roadmap.

Methods: This study used the CeHRes roadmap as a developmental guideline for proposing mHealth app features for self-management of prediabetic patients and was performed in 3 phases with one round in each phase. First, a contextual inquiry was conducted via an online self-administered questionnaire for both health care providers and patients. Second, the value specification phase elaborated on the outcomes from the contextual inquiry phase. Finally, prototype user design was performed in cocreation with end users. The design phase was also conducted via an online self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the proposed features of mHealth apps by prediabetic patients.

Results: A total of 20 health care providers participated in the study. The results revealed that the most powerful intervention for prediabetes was a combination of medication, physical activity, and healthy diet plans (12/20, 60%). Furthermore, the most common challenge faced by prediabetes patients was patient adherence to healthy diet and physical activity recommendations (10/20, 50%). Almost all patients believed that mHealth apps would be useful for prediabetic patients. A total of 48 prediabetic patients participated in the study. The results indicated that the most powerful intervention for prediabetic patients is a combination of healthy diet and physical activity plans (21/48, 44%), and the most frequent challenge that may lead the patients to discontinue the current intervention was the commitment to a physical activity plan (35/48, 75%). Furthermore, 15% (17/48) of patients use well-being and health apps to manage their current health status. The most common difficulties faced by the patients were navigating app features (mean 2.02 [SD 1.7]) followed by the app language (mean 1.88 [SD 2.0]); these difficulties occurred at a significantly higher rate among those with secondary or lower educational levels as compared to undergraduate and postgraduate levels (P<.05). Finally, the features proposed in the prototype design scored more than 2.5 points higher and indicate the need for these features to be included in the mHealth app.

Conclusions: This study aimed to provide real-world insights into the development of an mHealth app for a diabetes prevention intervention by involving both health care providers and prediabetic patients in KSUMC hospitals. Therefore, the proposed app, which comprises all necessary features, may aid patients with prediabetes in self-management and making changes in their lifestyle.

Citing Articles

The Effect of Activity Tracking Apps on Physical Activity and Glycemic Control in People with Prediabetes Compared to Normoglycemic Individuals: A Pilot Study.

Kalampoki A, Ntzani E, Asimakopoulos A, Liberopoulos E, Tentolouris N, Anastasiou G Nutrients. 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796569 PMC: 11722914. DOI: 10.3390/nu17010135.


Implementation Science Perspectives on Implementing Telemedicine Interventions for Hypertension or Diabetes Management: Scoping Review.

Khalid A, Dong Q, Chuluunbaatar E, Haldane V, Durrani H, Wei X J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e42134.

PMID: 36917174 PMC: 10131907. DOI: 10.2196/42134.


Developing mHealth to the Context and Valuation of Injured Patients and Professionals in Hospital Trauma Care: Qualitative and Quantitative Formative Evaluations.

Houwen T, Vugts M, Lansink K, Theeuwes H, Neequaye N, Beerekamp M JMIR Hum Factors. 2022; 9(2):e35342.

PMID: 35723928 PMC: 9254041. DOI: 10.2196/35342.

References
1.
Tieman J, Morgan D, Swetenham K, To T, Currow D . Designing clinically valuable telehealth resources: processes to develop a community-based palliative care prototype. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014; 3(3):e41. PMC: 4180353. DOI: 10.2196/resprot.3266. View

2.
Castro Sweet C, Chiguluri V, Gumpina R, Abbott P, Madero E, Payne M . Outcomes of a Digital Health Program With Human Coaching for Diabetes Risk Reduction in a Medicare Population. J Aging Health. 2017; 30(5):692-710. PMC: 5944079. DOI: 10.1177/0898264316688791. View

3.
Kumar S, Nilsen W, Abernethy A, Atienza A, Patrick K, Pavel M . Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 45(2):228-36. PMC: 3803146. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.017. View

4.
Klasnja P, Pratt W . Healthcare in the pocket: mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. J Biomed Inform. 2011; 45(1):184-98. PMC: 3272165. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.017. View

5.
Alanzi T . mHealth for diabetes self-management in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: barriers and solutions. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018; 11:535-546. PMC: 6183657. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S174198. View