» Articles » PMID: 34061591

Chromosomal Location Determines the Rate of Intrachromosomal Homologous Recombination in Salmonella

Overview
Journal mBio
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2021 Jun 1
PMID 34061591
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Homologous recombination is an important mechanism directly involved in the repair, organization, and evolution of prokaryotic and eukaryotic chromosomes. We developed a system, based on two genetic cassettes, that allows the measurement of recombinational repair rates between different locations on the chromosome. Using this system, we analyzed 81 different positional combinations throughout the chromosome to answer the question of how the position and orientation of sequences affect intrachromosomal homologous recombination. Our results show that recombination was possible between any two locations tested in this study and that recombinational repair rates varied by just above an order of magnitude. The observed differences in rate do not correlate with distance between the recombination cassettes or with distance from the origin of replication but could be explained if each location contributes individually to the recombination event. The relative levels of accessibility for recombination vary 5-fold between the various cassette locations, and we found that the nucleoid structure of the chromosome may be the major factor influencing the recombinational accessibility of each chromosomal site. Furthermore, we found that the orientation of the recombination cassettes had a significant impact on recombination. Recombinational repair rates for the cassettes inserted as direct repeats are, on average, 2.2-fold higher than those for the same sets inserted as inverted repeats. These results suggest that the bacterial chromosome is not homogenous with regard to homologous recombination, with regions that are more or less accessible, and that the orientation of genes affects recombination rates. Bacterial chromosomes frequently carry multiple copies of genes at separate chromosomal locations. In Salmonella, these include the 7 operons and the duplicate genes. Genes within these families coevolve by homologous recombination, but it is not obvious whether their rates of recombination reflect general rates of intrachromosomal recombination or are an evolved property particularly associated with these conserved genes and locations. Using a novel experimental system, we show that recombination is possible between all tested pairs of locations at rates that vary by just above 1 order of magnitude. Differences in rate do not correlate with distance between the sites or distance to the origin of replication but may be explained if each location contributes individually to the recombination event. Our results suggest the existence of bacterial chromosomal domains that are differentially available for recombination and that gene orientation affects recombination rates.

Citing Articles

Homologous recombination shapes the architecture and evolution of bacterial genomes.

Torrance E, Diop A, Bobay L Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 53(4).

PMID: 39718992 PMC: 11879095. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae1265.


Enhancing fatty acid and omega-3 production in Schizochytrium sp. using developed safe-harboring expression system.

Ryu A, Shin W, Jang S, Lin Y, Park Y, Choi Y J Biol Eng. 2024; 18(1):56.

PMID: 39390586 PMC: 11468124. DOI: 10.1186/s13036-024-00447-y.


Homologous Recombination Shapes the Architecture and Evolution of Bacterial Genomes.

Torrance E, Diop A, Bobay L bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38895235 PMC: 11185547. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.31.596828.


On the evolution of chromosomal regions with high gene strand bias in bacteria.

Tomasch J, Kopejtka K, Shivaramu S, Mujakic I, Koblizek M mBio. 2024; 15(6):e0060224.

PMID: 38752745 PMC: 11237797. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00602-24.


Serotype Screening of Subspecies I by Intergenic Sequence Ribotyping (ISR): Critical Updates.

Guard J, Jones D, Gast R, Garcia J, Rothrock M Microorganisms. 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36677389 PMC: 9863722. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11010097.

References
1.
Booker B, Deng S, Higgins N . DNA topology of highly transcribed operons in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 2010; 78(6):1348-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07394.x. View

2.
Yu D, Ellis H, Lee E, Jenkins N, Copeland N, Court D . An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(11):5978-83. PMC: 18544. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.100127597. View

3.
Verma S, Qian Z, Adhya S . Architecture of the Escherichia coli nucleoid. PLoS Genet. 2019; 15(12):e1008456. PMC: 6907758. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008456. View

4.
Brochet M, Rusniok C, Couve E, Dramsi S, Poyart C, Trieu-Cuot P . Shaping a bacterial genome by large chromosomal replacements, the evolutionary history of Streptococcus agalactiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(41):15961-6. PMC: 2572952. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803654105. View

5.
Sanderson K, Liu S . Chromosomal rearrangements in enteric bacteria. Electrophoresis. 1998; 19(4):569-72. DOI: 10.1002/elps.1150190417. View