» Articles » PMID: 34058984

The Holobiont Transcriptome of Teneral Tsetse Fly Species of Varying Vector Competence

Overview
Journal BMC Genomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2021 Jun 1
PMID 34058984
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Tsetse flies are the obligate vectors of African trypanosomes, which cause Human and Animal African Trypanosomiasis. Teneral flies (newly eclosed adults) are especially susceptible to parasite establishment and development, yet our understanding of why remains fragmentary. The tsetse gut microbiome is dominated by two Gammaproteobacteria, an essential and ancient mutualist Wigglesworthia glossinidia and a commensal Sodalis glossinidius. Here, we characterize and compare the metatranscriptome of teneral Glossina morsitans to that of G. brevipalpis and describe unique immunological, physiological, and metabolic landscapes that may impact vector competence differences between these two species.

Results: An active expression profile was observed for Wigglesworthia immediately following host adult metamorphosis. Specifically, 'translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis' followed by 'coenzyme transport and metabolism' were the most enriched clusters of orthologous genes (COGs), highlighting the importance of nutrient transport and metabolism even following host species diversification. Despite the significantly smaller Wigglesworthia genome more differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between interspecific isolates (n = 326, ~ 55% of protein coding genes) than between the corresponding Sodalis isolates (n = 235, ~ 5% of protein coding genes) likely reflecting distinctions in host co-evolution and adaptation. DEGs between Sodalis isolates included genes involved in chitin degradation that may contribute towards trypanosome susceptibility by compromising the immunological protection provided by the peritrophic matrix. Lastly, G. brevipalpis tenerals demonstrate a more immunologically robust background with significant upregulation of IMD and melanization pathways.

Conclusions: These transcriptomic differences may collectively contribute to vector competence differences between tsetse species and offers translational relevance towards the design of novel vector control strategies.

Citing Articles

Draft genome sequence of "palpalis gambiensis" isolate.

Spencer N, Santee M, Wetherhold A, Rio R Microbiol Resour Announc. 2024; 13(2):e0091223.

PMID: 38206026 PMC: 10868223. DOI: 10.1128/mra.00912-23.


Beyond canonical models: why a broader understanding of Diptera-microbiota interactions is essential for vector-borne disease control.

Arellano A, Sommer A, Coon K Evol Ecol. 2023; 37(1):165-188.

PMID: 37153630 PMC: 10162596. DOI: 10.1007/s10682-022-10197-2.


The Tsetse Metabolic Gambit: Living on Blood by Relying on Symbionts Demands Synchronization.

Lee M, Medina Munoz M, Rio R Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:905826.

PMID: 35756042 PMC: 9218860. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.905826.

References
1.
Agaisse H, Petersen U, Boutros M, Mathey-Prevot B, Perrimon N . Signaling role of hemocytes in Drosophila JAK/STAT-dependent response to septic injury. Dev Cell. 2003; 5(3):441-50. DOI: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00244-2. View

2.
Dale C, Welburn S . The endosymbionts of tsetse flies: manipulating host-parasite interactions. Int J Parasitol. 2001; 31(5-6):628-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(01)00151-5. View

3.
Dale C, Maudlin I . Sodalis gen. nov. and Sodalis glossinidius sp. nov., a microaerophilic secondary endosymbiont of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans morsitans. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999; 49 Pt 1:267-75. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-49-1-267. View

4.
Tarazona S, Garcia-Alcalde F, Dopazo J, Ferrer A, Conesa A . Differential expression in RNA-seq: a matter of depth. Genome Res. 2011; 21(12):2213-23. PMC: 3227109. DOI: 10.1101/gr.124321.111. View

5.
Attardo G, Strickler-Dinglasan P, Perkin S, Caler E, Bonaldo M, Soares M . Analysis of fat body transcriptome from the adult tsetse fly, Glossina morsitans morsitans. Insect Mol Biol. 2006; 15(4):411-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00649.x. View