» Articles » PMID: 34056648

Dosimetric Impact of Rotational Setup Errors in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Postoperative Cervical Cancer

Overview
Journal J Radiat Res
Date 2021 May 31
PMID 34056648
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the impact of rotational setup errors on the doses received during postoperative volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for cervical cancer. Overall, 121 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) sets from 20 patients were rigidly registered to reference computed tomography (CT) sets based on bony landmarks. The rotational setup errors (pitch, yaw and roll) were calculated. Then, 121 CT sets involving rotational setup errors were created, and the dose distribution in these CT sets were recalculated. The recalculated dosimetric parameters for the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OAR) were compared to the reference values, and the correlation coefficients between the dosimetric parameter differences and rotational setup errors were calculated. Only the pitch setup error was moderately correlated with CTV coverage (r ≥ 0.40) and strongly correlated with V45 for the bladder (r ≥ 0.91) and V40 for the rectum, small bowel and bone marrow (r ≥ 0.91). The maximum dosimetric difference in a single fraction and overall fractions was -1.59% and -0.69% in D98 for the CTV, 11.72% and 5.17% in V45 for the bladder and -8.03% and -4.68% in V40 for the rectum, respectively. In conclusion, rotational setup errors only slightly impact dose coverage during postoperative cervical cancer VMAT. However, the pitch setup error occasionally affected the doses received by the bladder or the rectum in the overall fraction when the error was systematic. Thus, rotational setup errors should be corrected by adjusting six-degree-of-freedom (DOF) couches to reduce dosimetric differences in the OARs.

Citing Articles

Preliminary study of feasibility of surface-guided radiotherapy with concurrent tumor treating fields for glioblastoma: region of interest.

Zheng J, Xu G, Guo W, Wang Y, Wu J, Zong D Radiat Oncol. 2024; 19(1):129.

PMID: 39334165 PMC: 11430246. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02525-3.


Optimal Correction Strategy of Image Guided Radiation Therapy Including the Paraortic Lymph Node Region in Patients With Cervical Cancers.

Wakabayashi K, Hirata M, Monzen H, Inagaki T, Sonomura T Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024; 9(10):101590.

PMID: 39314904 PMC: 11417225. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101590.


Effect of body contour changes on the setup and dosimetric accuracy of radiotherapy after cervical cancer surgery.

Li Y, Sun W, Liu S, Xia W, Yang X, Wang L Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1392741.

PMID: 39286017 PMC: 11402609. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1392741.


The Prediction of Stress in Radiation Therapy: Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Biological Signals.

Jeong S, Pyo H, Park W, Han Y Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38893087 PMC: 11171009. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16111964.


Evaluation of a head rest prototype for rotational corrections in three degrees of freedom.

Schindhelm R, Razinskas G, Ringholz J, Kraft J, Sauer O, Wegener S J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 25(2):e14172.

PMID: 37793069 PMC: 10860431. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14172.


References
1.
Toita T, Ohno T, Kaneyasu Y, Uno T, Yoshimura R, Kodaira T . A consensus-based guideline defining the clinical target volume for pelvic lymph nodes in external beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010; 40(5):456-63. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyp191. View

2.
Murphy M . Image-guided patient positioning: if one cannot correct for rotational offsets in external-beam radiotherapy setup, how should rotational offsets be managed?. Med Phys. 2007; 34(6):1880-3. DOI: 10.1118/1.2731485. View

3.
Ahmad R, Hoogeman M, Quint S, Mens J, De Pree I, Heijmen B . Inter-fraction bladder filling variations and time trends for cervical cancer patients assessed with a portable 3-dimensional ultrasound bladder scanner. Radiother Oncol. 2008; 89(2):172-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.005. View

4.
Guckenberger M, Meyer J, Vordermark D, Baier K, Wilbert J, Flentje M . Magnitude and clinical relevance of translational and rotational patient setup errors: a cone-beam CT study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 65(3):934-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.02.019. View

5.
Ahmad R, Hoogeman M, Quint S, Mens J, Vasquez Osorio E, Heijmen B . Residual setup errors caused by rotation and non-rigid motion in prone-treated cervical cancer patients after online CBCT image-guidance. Radiother Oncol. 2012; 103(3):322-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.04.013. View