» Articles » PMID: 34056076

Slow Progress with the Most Widely Used Animal Model: Ten Years of Metacognition Research in Rats, 2009-2019

Overview
Journal Anim Behav Cogn
Date 2021 May 31
PMID 34056076
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Until recently, demonstrations of metacognition in primates have been frequent and robust, while in rodents they have been few and equivocal. However, the past few years have seen a change in this trend with the introduction of novel methods to determine whether metacognitive responding is governed by internal or external sources of stimulus control in rats. Such studies suggest that like primates, rats can indeed use internal assessment of memory strengths to guide metacognitive responding. Strong behavioral paradigms suitable for rodents support the development of easily-accessible animal models for the neurobiology of metamemory and translational studies on diseases of memory. They also allow for a more complete comparative study of the evolution of metacognition, as the presence of this ability in rodents would suggest that metacognition evolved ~80 rather than ~25 million years ago.

Citing Articles

Information-seeking in mice (Mus musculus) during visual discrimination: study using a distractor elimination paradigm.

Hataji Y, Goto K Anim Cogn. 2024; 27(1):81.

PMID: 39617817 PMC: 11609126. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01920-3.


When does metacognition evolve in the opt-out paradigm?.

Watson R Anim Cogn. 2024; 27(1):68.

PMID: 39436474 PMC: 11496335. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01910-5.


Editorial: Animal-friendly methods for rodent behavioral testing in neuroscience research.

dIsa R, Fasano S, Brambilla R Front Behav Neurosci. 2024; 18:1431310.

PMID: 38983871 PMC: 11232432. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1431310.

References
1.
Lee K, Preston A, Wise T, Templer V . Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats. J Vis Exp. 2018; (136). PMC: 6101758. DOI: 10.3791/57489. View

2.
Yuki S, Okanoya K . Rats show adaptive choice in a metacognitive task with high uncertainty. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017; 43(1):109-118. DOI: 10.1037/xan0000130. View

3.
Panoz-Brown D, Corbin H, Dalecki S, Gentry M, Brotheridge S, Sluka C . Rats Remember Items in Context Using Episodic Memory. Curr Biol. 2016; 26(20):2821-2826. PMC: 5117826. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.023. View

4.
Basile B, Schroeder G, Brown E, Templer V, Hampton R . Evaluation of seven hypotheses for metamemory performance in rhesus monkeys. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014; 144(1):85-102. PMC: 4308511. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000031. View

5.
Smith J, Beran M, Couchman J, Coutinho M . The comparative study of metacognition: sharper paradigms, safer inferences. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008; 15(4):679-91. PMC: 4607312. DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.4.679. View