» Articles » PMID: 34054401

Iterative Restoration of the Fringe Phase (REFRASE) for QSM

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2021 May 31
PMID 34054401
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), reconstructed results can be critically biased by misinterpreted or missing phase data near the edges of the brain support originating from the non-local relationship between field and susceptibility. These data either have to be excluded or corrected before further processing can take place. To address this, our iterative restoration of the fringe phase (REFRASE) approach simultaneously enhances the accuracy of multi-echo phase data QSM maps and the extent of the area available for evaluation. Data loss caused by strong local phase gradients near the surface of the brain support is recovered within the original phase data using harmonic and dipole-based fields extrapolated from a robust support region toward an extended brain mask. Over several iterations, phase data are rectified prior to the application of further QSM processing steps. The concept is successfully validated on numerical phantoms and brain scans from a cohort of volunteers. The increased extent of the mask and improved numerical stability within the segmented confirm the efficacy of the presented method in comparison to traditional evaluation.

Citing Articles

Accurate Intramyocardial Hemorrhage Assessment with Fast, Free-running, Cardiac Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Huang Y, Guan X, Zhang X, Yoosefian G, Ho H, Huang L Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024; 6(6):e230376.

PMID: 39665631 PMC: 11683678. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.230376.


Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: A consensus of the ISMRM electro-magnetic tissue properties study group.

Bilgic B, Costagli M, Chan K, Duyn J, Langkammer C, Lee J Magn Reson Med. 2024; 91(5):1834-1862.

PMID: 38247051 PMC: 10950544. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30006.

References
1.
Liu C, Li W, Tong K, Yeom K, Kuzminski S . Susceptibility-weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 42(1):23-41. PMC: 4406874. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24768. View

2.
Reichenbach J . The future of susceptibility contrast for assessment of anatomy and function. Neuroimage. 2012; 62(2):1311-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.004. View

3.
Deistung A, Schweser F, Reichenbach J . Overview of quantitative susceptibility mapping. NMR Biomed. 2016; 30(4). DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3569. View

4.
de Rochefort L, Liu T, Kressler B, Liu J, Spincemaille P, Lebon V . Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2009; 63(1):194-206. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22187. View

5.
Abdul-Rahman H, Gdeisat M, Burton D, Lalor M, Lilley F, Moore C . Fast and robust three-dimensional best path phase unwrapping algorithm. Appl Opt. 2007; 46(26):6623-35. DOI: 10.1364/ao.46.006623. View