Bilateral Implantation of a New Refractive Multi-Segmented Multifocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract or Refractive Lens Exchange Patients

Overview

Journal Clin Ophthalmol

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2021 May 31

PMID 34054290

Citations 1

Authors

Mike P Holzer

Rudy M M A Nuijts

Soraya M R Jonker

Erik L J G Mertens

Asim Bozkurt Sener

Jorge A O Cazal

Antoni Salvador Playa

Ramon Ruiz Mesa

Bettina C Thomas

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new multi-segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) after phacoemulsification and refractive lens exchange (RLE).

Patients And Methods: In this prospective, multicenter clinical trial, 63 presbyopic subjects who had cataract or where RLE candidates were bilaterally implanted with the Precizon Presbyopia IOL (Ophtec BV, Groningen, the Netherlands) after phacoemulsification. The study was conducted at 6 clinical centers in Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Turkey and Spain. Subjects were evaluated at baseline and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 and 3 months postoperatively for monocular and binocular uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected (UIVA) and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), uncorrected (UNVA), corrected (CNVA) and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), contrast sensitivity and quality of vision.

Results: Three months postoperatively, binocular UDVA and CDVA of ≥20/40 was achieved in 98.4% (60/61) and 100%, respectively. Binocular UIVA and DCIVA of ≥20/40 was achieved in 96.7% (59/61) and 93.4% (57/61) respectively. Binocular UNVA, CNVA and DCNVA of ≥20/40 was achieved in 93.4% (57/61), 98.4% (60/61) and 95% (57/60) subjects, respectively. Complete spectacle independence was achieved in 80% (49/61) patients; 93% of patients reported that they were quite or very satisfied with the outcomes of the procedure.

Conclusion: Precizon Presbyopia IOL implantation is a safe and effective method to provide good visual acuity at all distances in presbyopic and cataract patients.

Citing Articles

Visual and patient reported outcomes provided by a refractive multifocal intraocular lens based on continuous transitional focus.

Alio J, Martinez-Abad A, Ruiz-Mesa R, Kim H, Mendicute J, Ribeiro F Eye Vis (Lond). 2024; 11(1):41.

PMID: 39402644 PMC: 11479541. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-024-00408-y.

References

Venter J, Pelouskova M, Collins B, Schallhorn S, Hannan S . Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction in 9366 eyes using a refractive segmented multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39(10):1477-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.035. View

Friedrich R . Intraocular lens multifocality combined with the compensation for corneal spherical aberration: a new concept of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2012; 3(3):375-83. PMC: 3506050. DOI: 10.1159/000343919. View

Lin H, Chen W, Ding Z, Chen W, Wu C . Clinical evaluation of two multifocal intraocular lens implantation patterns. Int J Ophthalmol. 2012; 5(1):76-83. PMC: 3340833. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.01.16. View

Yoshino M, Bissen-Miyajima H, Oki S, Minami K, Nakamura K . Two-year follow-up after implantation of diffractive aspheric silicone multifocal intraocular lenses. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010; 89(7):617-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01792.x. View

de Vries N, Nuijts R . Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39(2):268-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.12.002. View

Shieh K, Lee D . Preferred viewing distance and screen angle of electronic paper displays. Appl Ergon. 2006; 38(5):601-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.06.008. View

Tsaousis K, Plainis S, Dimitrakos S, Tsinopoulos I . Binocularity enhances visual acuity of eyes implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2013; 29(4):246-50. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20130318-03. View

de Vries N, Webers C, Montes-Mico R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Nuijts R . Visual outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of a +3.00 D or +4.00 D aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lens: Comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36(8):1316-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.036. View

Hutz W, Jackel R, Hoffman P . Comparison of visual performance of silicone and acrylic multifocal IOLs utilizing the same diffractive design. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010; 90(6):530-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.01984.x. View

10.

Cillino S, Casuccio A, Di Pace F, Morreale R, Pillitteri F, Cillino G . One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115(9):1508-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.017. View

11.

Soda M, Yaguchi S . Effect of decentration on the optical performance in multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmologica. 2012; 227(4):197-204. DOI: 10.1159/000333820. View

12.

Packer M, Chu Y, Waltz K, Donnenfeld E, Wallace 3rd R, Featherstone K . Evaluation of the aspheric tecnis multifocal intraocular lens: one-year results from the first cohort of the food and drug administration clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010; 149(4):577-584.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.10.022. View

13.

Chang D . Visual acuity and patient satisfaction at varied distances and lighting conditions after implantation of an aspheric diffractive multifocal one-piece intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016; 10:1471-7. PMC: 4977080. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S108298. View

14.

Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F . Correlation between pupillary size and intraocular lens decentration and visual acuity of a zonal-progressive multifocal lens and a monofocal lens. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108(11):2011-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00756-4. View

15.

Cezon Prieto J, Bautista M . Visual outcomes after implantation of a refractive multifocal intraocular lens with a +3.00 D addition. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36(9):1508-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.03.048. View

16.

Cillino G, Casuccio A, Pasti M, Bono V, Mencucci R, Cillino S . Working-age cataract patients: visual results, reading performance, and quality of life with three diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 2013; 121(1):34-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.034. View

17.

Alio J, Plaza-Puche A, Javaloy J, Ayala M, Moreno L, Pinero D . Comparison of a new refractive multifocal intraocular lens with an inferior segmental near add and a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(3):555-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.036. View

18.

Alfonso J, Fernandez-Vega L, Puchades C, Montes-Mico R . Intermediate visual function with different multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36(5):733-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.018. View

19.

Chang D . Prospective functional and clinical comparison of bilateral ReZoom and ReSTOR intraocular lenses in patients 70 years or younger. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34(6):934-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.053. View

20.

McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Moore J . The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51(11):5537-45. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5341. View