» Articles » PMID: 34050232

Accurate Detection and Quantification of Seasonal Abundance of American Bullfrog (Lithobates Catesbeianus) Using DdPCR EDNA Assays

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 May 29
PMID 34050232
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The invasive American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) imperils freshwater biodiversity worldwide. Effective management hinges on early detection of incipient invasions and subsequent rapid response, as established populations are extremely difficult to eradicate. Although environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods provide a highly sensitive alternative to conventional surveillance techniques, extensive testing is imperative to generate reliable output. Here, we tested and compared the performance of two primer/probe assays to detect and quantify the abundance of bullfrogs in Western Europe in silico and in situ using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Although both assays proved to be equally target-specific and sensitive, one outperformed the other in ddPCR detection resolution (i.e., distinguishing groups of target-positive and target-negative droplets), and hence was selected for further analyses. Mesocosm experiments revealed that tadpole abundance and biomass explained 99% of the variation in eDNA concentration. Because per individual eDNA emission rates did not differ significantly among tadpoles and juveniles, and adults mostly reside out of the water, eDNA concentration can be used as an approximation of local bullfrog abundance in natural populations. Seasonal eDNA patterns in three colonized ponds showed parallel fluctuations in bullfrog eDNA concentration. An increase in eDNA concentration was detected in spring, followed by a strong peak coinciding with the breeding season (August, September or October), and continuously low eDNA concentrations during winter. With this study, we report the validation process required for appropriately implementing eDNA barcoding analyses in lentic systems. We demonstrate that this technique can serve as a solid and reliable tool to detect the early stages of bullfrog invasions and to quantify temporal changes in abundance that will be useful in coordinating large-scale bullfrog eradication programs and evaluating their efficiency.

Citing Articles

Environmental DNA concentrations vary greatly across productive and degradative conditions, with implications for the precision of population estimates.

Parsley M, Crespi E, Rittenhouse T, Brunner J, Goldberg C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17392.

PMID: 39075085 PMC: 11286860. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66732-4.


Drop it all: extraction-free detection of targeted marine species through optimized direct droplet digital PCR.

Scriver M, von Ammon U, Youngbull C, Pochon X, Stanton J, Gemmell N PeerJ. 2024; 12:e16969.

PMID: 38410796 PMC: 10896080. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16969.


Environmental DNA Assay for the Detection of the American Bullfrog () in the Early Stages of the Invasion in the Ebre Delta.

Sanz N, Franch N, Araguas R, Vinas J, Vidal O Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 36830468 PMC: 9952411. DOI: 10.3390/ani13040683.


Assessing the breeding phenology of a threatened frog species using eDNA and automatic acoustic monitoring.

Chen Y, Tournayre O, Tian H, Lougheed S PeerJ. 2023; 11:e14679.

PMID: 36710869 PMC: 9879156. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14679.

References
1.
Dunn N, Priestley V, Herraiz A, Arnold R, Savolainen V . Behavior and season affect crayfish detection and density inference using environmental DNA. Ecol Evol. 2017; 7(19):7777-7785. PMC: 5632632. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3316. View

2.
Valentini A, Pompanon F, Taberlet P . DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008; 24(2):110-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011. View

3.
Furlan E, Gleeson D, Hardy C, P Duncan R . A framework for estimating the sensitivity of eDNA surveys. Mol Ecol Resour. 2015; 16(3):641-54. DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12483. View

4.
Wilcox T, McKelvey K, Young M, Jane S, Lowe W, Whiteley A . Robust detection of rare species using environmental DNA: the importance of primer specificity. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e59520. PMC: 3608683. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059520. View

5.
Nathan L, Simmons M, Wegleitner B, Jerde C, Mahon A . Quantifying environmental DNA signals for aquatic invasive species across multiple detection platforms. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(21):12800-6. DOI: 10.1021/es5034052. View