» Articles » PMID: 34049479

Three-dimensional Visualization Improves the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Superficial Gastric Neoplasia

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2021 May 29
PMID 34049479
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) technology has been used in many fields, including flexible endoscopy. We evaluated the usefulness of 3D visualization for endoscopically diagnosing superficial gastric neoplasia.

Methods: Twelve participants (4 novices, 4 trainees and 4 experts) evaluated two-dimensional (2D) and 3D endoscopic still images of 28 gastric neoplasias, obtained before ESD with white-light imaging (WLI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI). Assessments of the delineation accuracy of tumor extent and tumor morphology under 2D and 3D visualization were based on the histopathological diagnosis of ESD specimens. Participants answered visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires (0-10, worst to best) concerning the (a) ease of recognition of lesion morphology, (b) lesion extent and (c) comprehensive endoscopic cognition under 2D and 3D visualization. The endpoints were the accuracy of tumor extent and morphology type and the degree of confidence in assessing (a)-(c).

Results: The delineation accuracy of lesion extent [mean (95% confidence interval)] with WLI under 3D visualization [60.2% (56.1-64.3%)] was significantly higher than that under 2D visualization [52.3% (48.2-56.4%)] (P < 0.001). The accuracy with NBI under 3D visualization [70.3% (66.8-73.7%)] was also significantly higher than that under 2D visualization [64.2% (60.7-67.4%)] (P < 0.001). The accuracy of the morphology type with NBI under 3D visualization was significantly higher than that under 2D visualization (P = 0.004). The VAS for all aspects of endoscopic recognition under 3D visualization was significantly better than that under 2D visualization (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Three-dimensional visualization can enhance the diagnostic quality for superficial gastric tumors.

Citing Articles

Application of imaging technology for the diagnosis of malignancy in the pancreaticobiliary duodenal junction (Review).

Yang W, Hu P, Zuo C Oncol Lett. 2024; 28(6):596.

PMID: 39430731 PMC: 11487531. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14729.


High-Resolution Ex-Vivo Imaging of Retina with a Laptop-Based Portable Endoscope.

Ge Y, Jin K, Wang Y, Xu Y, Lu H, Ye J J Ophthalmol. 2022; 2022:1903516.

PMID: 35450322 PMC: 9017551. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1903516.

References
1.
Dohi O, Yagi N, Majima A, Horii Y, Kitaichi T, Onozawa Y . Diagnostic ability of magnifying endoscopy with blue laser imaging for early gastric cancer: a prospective study. Gastric Cancer. 2016; 20(2):297-303. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-016-0620-6. View

2.
. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14(2):101-12. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5. View

3.
Chiu P, Yip H, Xia X, Chan S, Ng E, Lau J . How I do it: Flexible 3-D endoscope for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc. 2018; 31(3):323-328. DOI: 10.1111/den.13315. View

4.
Kikuchi D, Kaise M, Nomura K, Toba T, Kuribayashi Y, Tanaka M . Feasibility Study of the Three-Dimensional Flexible Endoscope in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An ex vivo Animal Study. Digestion. 2017; 95(3):237-241. DOI: 10.1159/000468924. View

5.
Aradaib M, Neary P, Hafeez A, Kalbassi R, Parvaiz A, ORiordain D . Safe adoption of robotic colorectal surgery using structured training: early Irish experience. J Robot Surg. 2018; 13(5):657-662. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-00911-0. View