» Articles » PMID: 34045292

Representation of Persons Experiencing Homelessness and Coding of Homelessness in General Practices: Descriptive Evaluation Using Healthcare Utilisation Data

Overview
Journal BJGP Open
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 May 28
PMID 34045292
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Epidemiological studies focused on primary healthcare needs of persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) are often based on data from specialist homeless healthcare services.

Aim: To explore the presentation of PEH, coding of homelessness, and associated health conditions in mainstream primary care general practices in England.

Design & Setting: EMIS electronic database search of medical records was conducted across 48 general practices in a clinical commissioning group (CCG), representing one of the most socioeconomically deprived regions in England, which also lacks a specialist primary healthcare service for PEH.

Method: Key terms and codes were used to identify PEH, their respective diagnoses across 22 health conditions, and prescribed medications over the past 4 years.

Results: From a population of approximately 321 000, 43 (0.013%) people were coded as PEH, compared with a homelessness prevalence of 0.5% in the English general population. Mental health conditions were the most prevalent diagnoses among the PEH registrants (56.6%); the recorded prevalence of other common long-term conditions in PEH was lower than the levels observed in PEH registered with specialist homelessness health services.

Conclusion: In a population with approximately four times higher rate of statutory homelessness, PEH representation in mainstream general practices was under-represented by several folds. As homelessness overlaps with mental health, substance misuse, and long-term health conditions, consistent coding of homelessness in medical records is imperative in order to offer tailored support and prevention actions when patients present for services.

Citing Articles

Patterns, circumstances and risk factors associated with non-fatal substance overdose in a cohort of homeless population: an observational study.

Anderson J, Kurmi O, Lowrie R, Araf A, Paudyal V Int J Clin Pharm. 2024; 47(1):107-118.

PMID: 39560880 PMC: 11748478. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01812-z.


The public health significance of prior homelessness: findings on multimorbidity and mental health from a nationally representative survey.

Chilman N, Schofield P, McManus S, Ronaldson A, Stagg A, Das-Munshi J Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2024; 33:e63.

PMID: 39513299 PMC: 11669814. DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000659.


Barriers and facilitators to health care access for people experiencing homelessness in four European countries: an exploratory qualitative study.

Carmichael C, Schiffler T, Smith L, Moudatsou M, Tabaki I, Donate-Martinez A Int J Equity Health. 2023; 22(1):206.

PMID: 37803317 PMC: 10559410. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-02011-4.


Predictors and consequences of homelessness in whole-population observational studies that used administrative data: a systematic review.

Mitchell E, Waring T, Ahern E, ODonovan D, OReilly D, Bradley D BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):1610.

PMID: 37612701 PMC: 10463451. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16503-z.


Key causes and long-term trends related to emergency department and inpatient hospital admissions of homeless persons in England.

Paudyal V, Vohra N, Price M, Jalal Z, Saunders K Int J Emerg Med. 2023; 16(1):48.

PMID: 37550625 PMC: 10405435. DOI: 10.1186/s12245-023-00526-9.


References
1.
Johnsen S, Cuthill F, Blenkinsopp J . Outreach-based clinical pharmacist prescribing input into the healthcare of people experiencing homelessness: a qualitative investigation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):7. PMC: 7780619. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-06013-8. View

2.
Paudyal V, Saunders K . Homeless reduction act in England: impact on health services. Lancet. 2018; 392(10143):195-197. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31383-7. View

3.
Salhi B, White M, Pitts S, Wright D . Homelessness and Emergency Medicine: A Review of the Literature. Acad Emerg Med. 2017; 25(5):577-593. DOI: 10.1111/acem.13358. View

4.
Pinto A, Bondy M, Rucchetto A, Ihnat J, Kaufman A . Screening for poverty and intervening in a primary care setting: an acceptability and feasibility study. Fam Pract. 2019; 36(5):634-638. PMC: 6781937. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmy129. View

5.
Buchman S . Screening for poverty in family practice. Can Fam Physician. 2012; 58(6):709, 710. PMC: 3374695. View