» Articles » PMID: 34045134

Efficacy and Tolerability of Immunotherapy in Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with or Without Chemotherapy: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2021 May 28
PMID 34045134
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Evidence of programmed death-1 inhibitors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma has been accumulated. However, previous clinical studies were basically small sample size.

Objective: This study aimed to summarize existing studies to comprehensively compare programmed death-1 inhibitors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with or without chemotherapy.

Methods: Different databases were searched for full-text publications with a programmed death-1 inhibitor with or without chemotherapy. No study-to-study heterogeneity was detected, and fixed-effect models were applied to synthesize data.

Results: Seven studies were included. The mean progression-free survival duration of programmed death-1 inhibitors treatment was 4.66 months. The 6 month progression-free survival rate was 50%, however, the12 month progression-free survival rate fell to 27%. Comparing with programmed death-1 inhibitor monotherapy, the objective response rate was higher in combination therapy (pooled RR=2.90, 95% CI: 2.07-4.08). The partial response rate was higher in patients receiving programmed death-1 in association with chemotherapy (pooled RR=3.09, 95% CI: 2.15-4.46), In contrast, the progressive disease rate was lower in combination therapy group (pooled RR=0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.31). Stable disease condition was comparable (pooled RR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.50-1.64) with or without chemotherapy. Programmed death-1 single use or combined with chemotherapy did not influence the total adverse events occurrence (pooled RR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.93-1.05). However, combination therapy could increase the risk of serious adverse events such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia.

Conclusion: The present study summarized the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 inhibitors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Combination therapy showed higher anti-tumor activity except for higher risk of myelosuppression.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of molecular targeted therapies in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.

Htet H, Anaghan J, Jaiprakash H, Burud I, Subramaniam T, Iezhitsa I BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):110.

PMID: 39838362 PMC: 11748561. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13528-y.


Treatment-Related Lymphopenia is Possibly a Marker of Good Prognosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.

Weng K, Lei H, Shen D, Wang Y, Zhu X Cancer Manag Res. 2024; 16:603-616.

PMID: 38855327 PMC: 11162643. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S456717.


Reshaping the systemic tumor immune environment (STIE) and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) to enhance immunotherapy efficacy in solid tumors.

Xu L, Zou C, Zhang S, Chu T, Zhang Y, Chen W J Hematol Oncol. 2022; 15(1):87.

PMID: 35799264 PMC: 9264569. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-022-01307-2.

References
1.
Cohen J . Vaccine Development for Epstein-Barr Virus. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018; 1045:477-493. PMC: 6328312. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7230-7_22. View

2.
Reis H, Metzenmacher M, Goetz M, Savvidou N, Darwiche K, Aigner C . MET Expression in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Effect on Clinical Outcomes of Chemotherapy, Targeted Therapy, and Immunotherapy. Clin Lung Cancer. 2018; 19(4):e441-e463. DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.03.010. View

3.
Deng R, Lu J, Liu X, Peng X, Wang J, Li X . PD-L1 Expression is Highly Associated with Tumor-Associated Macrophage Infiltration in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res. 2020; 12:11585-11596. PMC: 7669506. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S274913. View

4.
Zhang N, Tu J, Wang X, Chu Q . Programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 checkpoint inhibitors: differences in mechanism of action. Immunotherapy. 2019; 11(5):429-441. DOI: 10.2217/imt-2018-0110. View

5.
Secondino S, Zecca M, Licitra L, Gurrado A, Schiavetto I, Bossi P . T-cell therapy for EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma: preparative lymphodepleting chemotherapy does not improve clinical results. Ann Oncol. 2011; 23(2):435-41. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr134. View