» Articles » PMID: 34043783

Universal Features in Panarthropod Inter-Limb Coordination During Forward Walking

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 May 27
PMID 34043783
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Terrestrial animals must often negotiate heterogeneous, varying environments. Accordingly, their locomotive strategies must adapt to a wide range of terrain, as well as to a range of speeds to accomplish different behavioral goals. Studies in Drosophila have found that inter-leg coordination patterns (ICPs) vary smoothly with walking speed, rather than switching between distinct gaits as in vertebrates (e.g., horses transitioning between trotting and galloping). Such a continuum of stepping patterns implies that separate neural controllers are not necessary for each observed ICP. Furthermore, the spectrum of Drosophila stepping patterns includes all canonical coordination patterns observed during forward walking in insects. This raises the exciting possibility that the controller in Drosophila is common to all insects, and perhaps more generally to panarthropod walkers. Here, we survey and collate data on leg kinematics and inter-leg coordination relationships during forward walking in a range of arthropod species, as well as include data from a recent behavioral investigation into the tardigrade Hypsibius exemplaris. Using this comparative dataset, we point to several functional and morphological features that are shared among panarthropods. The goal of the framework presented in this review is to emphasize the importance of comparative functional and morphological analyses in understanding the origins and diversification of walking in Panarthropoda. Introduction.

Citing Articles

Natural variability and individuality of walking behavior in Drosophila.

Godesberg V, Bockemuhl T, Buschges A J Exp Biol. 2024; 227(22).

PMID: 39422060 PMC: 11607691. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.247878.


Comparative analysis of tardigrade locomotion across life stage, species, and disulfiram treatment.

Anderson E, Houck S, Conklin C, Tucci K, Rodas J, Mori K PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0310738.

PMID: 39292666 PMC: 11410187. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310738.


Robust and reusable self-organized locomotion of legged robots under adaptive physical and neural communications.

Sun T, Dai Z, Manoonpong P Front Neural Circuits. 2023; 17:1111285.

PMID: 37063383 PMC: 10102392. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2023.1111285.


Kinematic Modeling at the Ant Scale: Propagation of Model Parameter Uncertainties.

Arroyave-Tobon S, Drapin J, Kaniewski A, Linares J, Moretto P Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:767914.

PMID: 35299633 PMC: 8921731. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.767914.


The Smooth Transition From Many-Legged to Bipedal Locomotion-Gradual Leg Force Reduction and its Impact on Total Ground Reaction Forces, Body Dynamics and Gait Transitions.

Weihmann T Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 9:769684.

PMID: 35186911 PMC: 8855104. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.769684.

References
1.
Smith F, Boothby T, Giovannini I, Rebecchi L, Jockusch E, Goldstein B . The Compact Body Plan of Tardigrades Evolved by the Loss of a Large Body Region. Curr Biol. 2016; 26(2):224-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.059. View

2.
Grabowska M, Godlewska E, Schmidt J, Daun-Gruhn S . Quadrupedal gaits in hexapod animals - inter-leg coordination in free-walking adult stick insects. J Exp Biol. 2012; 215(Pt 24):4255-66. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.073643. View

3.
Dickinson M, Farley C, Full R, Koehl M, Kram R, Lehman S . How animals move: an integrative view. Science. 2001; 288(5463):100-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5463.100. View

4.
Niven J, Graham C, Burrows M . Diversity and evolution of the insect ventral nerve cord. Annu Rev Entomol. 2007; 53:253-71. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091322. View

5.
Boehm C, Schultz J, Clemente C . Understanding the limits to the hydraulic leg mechanism: the effects of speed and size on limb kinematics in vagrant arachnids. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2021; 207(2):105-116. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-021-01468-4. View