» Articles » PMID: 34041068

Study of Risk Factors and Treatment Modalities of Ectopic Pregnancy

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 May 27
PMID 34041068
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: In the past two decades globally, the incidence of ectopic pregnancy has been increasing exponentially. One of the major triggering factors being the introduction of medical assisted procreation techniques. The present study emphasis more on clinical presentations, risk factors, associated maternal morbidity and mortality with respect to ectopic pregnancy.

Methodology: Patients diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy in reproductive age group (15-44 years) after clinical examination and investigations during one year period were included in the study. It was a prospective study using contingency table analysis and Chi-square test.

Results: A total of 42 patients were diagnosed and treated as ectopic pregnancy during the study period. Risk factors were found in 37 patients, of which most common were white discharge per vagina (WDPV) in 20 and tubectomy in 6 patients. PID was seen in 5 and no risk factors in 5 patients. Of the 42 patients, 37 underwent surgery as primary modality of treatment and 5 patients underwent medical management. Only 2 patients had complete resolution with medical management while 3 failed medical management. Post operative period was uneventful.

Conclusion: As the incidence of ectopic pregnancy has been on the rise, screening of high risk cases, early diagnosis and early intervention are required to enhance maternal survival and conservation of reproductive capacity.

Citing Articles

Clinical Profile, Risk Factors and Outcomes of Ectopic Pregnancy in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Prospective Indian Study.

Nalini N, Singh K, S N, Kumari A Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e49483.

PMID: 38152791 PMC: 10752081. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49483.


Interventional Challenges in Non-Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy.

Naik S, Kumar S, Rani A, Patil S, Voorkara U, S Kamath V J Family Reprod Health. 2022; 16(1):78-85.

PMID: 35903761 PMC: 9287113. DOI: 10.18502/jfrh.v16i1.8597.


Ectopic pregnancy: a resident's guide to imaging findings and diagnostic pitfalls.

Houser M, Kandalaft N, Khati N Emerg Radiol. 2021; 29(1):161-172.

PMID: 34618256 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-021-01974-7.

References
1.
Korhonen J, Stenman U, Ylostalo P . Serum human chorionic gonadotropin dynamics during spontaneous resolution of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1994; 61(4):632-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56638-2. View

2.
Sivalingam V, Duncan W, Kirk E, Shephard L, Horne A . Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2011; 37(4):231-40. PMC: 3213855. DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-0073. View

3.
Horne A, Duncan W, Critchley H . The need for serum biomarker development for diagnosing and excluding tubal ectopic pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010; 89(3):299-301. PMC: 2971461. DOI: 10.3109/00016340903568191. View

4.
Creanga A, Shapiro-Mendoza C, Bish C, Zane S, Berg C, Callaghan W . Trends in ectopic pregnancy mortality in the United States: 1980-2007. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117(4):837-843. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182113c10. View

5.
Horne A, Shaw J, Murdoch A, McDonald S, Williams A, Jabbour H . Placental growth factor: a promising diagnostic biomarker for tubal ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 96(1):E104-8. PMC: 3017520. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2010-1403. View