» Articles » PMID: 34036087

Negative Video Capsule Endoscopy Had a High Negative Predictive Value for Small Bowel Lesions, but Diagnostic Capability May Be Lower in Young Patients with Overt Bleeding

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2021 May 26
PMID 34036087
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patients with potential small bowel bleeding (PSBB) who have negative results of video capsule endoscopy (VCE), clinical course, rate of rebleeding, and missed lesions with their predictors are essential for further management decision.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients presenting with PSBB who had negative VCE findings between January 2008 and December 2016. All patients had to have at least two years of follow-up data to be included. Patients with <2 years of follow-up in their medical record were interviewed by telephone to determine if any unrecorded rebleeding episodes occurred.

Results: One hundred forty-two patients were included. The mean age was 60.9 years, and 52.8% were male. Eighty-one patients presented with overt bleeding. The median duration of follow-up was 5.08 years. During the follow-up period, 30 patients experienced rebleeding. The cumulative rate of rebleeding at 1, 2, and 5 years was 10.0%, 14.3%, and 22.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and presentation of overt bleeding to be independent predictors of rebleeding. There were only nine small bowel lesions (6.3%) missed by VCE. These nine patients, compared with others, were significantly younger and tended to present with overt bleeding.

Conclusion: Rebleeding was not uncommon in PSBB after negative VCE; however, the rate of missing small bowel lesions was low. Nonetheless, further investigations may be considered in young patients who present with overt bleeding.

Citing Articles

Corrigendum to "Negative Video Capsule Endoscopy Had a High Negative Predictive Value for Small Bowel Lesions, but Diagnostic Capability May Be Lower in Young Patients with Overt Bleeding".

Khamplod S, Limsrivilai J, Kaosombatwattana U, Pausawasdi N, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Pongprasobchai S Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025; 2025:9836801.

PMID: 39959028 PMC: 11824861. DOI: 10.1155/cjgh/9836801.


Effect of small bowel transit time on accuracy of video capsule endoscopy in evaluating suspected small bowel bleeding.

Mohan N, Jarrett S, Pop A, Rodriguez D, Dudnick R World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2022; 13(6):88-95.

PMID: 36405301 PMC: 9669782. DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v13.i6.88.


Clinical features of capsule endoscopy in young adults: A single-center retrospective study.

Xu H, Chen Y, Wang M, Zhu S JGH Open. 2022; 6(9):637-642.

PMID: 36091324 PMC: 9446405. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12801.

References
1.
Saurin J, Delvaux M, Gaudin J, Fassler I, Villarejo J, Vahedi K . Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: blinded comparison with video push-enteroscopy. Endoscopy. 2003; 35(7):576-84. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40244. View

2.
Riccioni M, Urgesi R, Cianci R, Rizzo G, DAngelo L, Marmo R . Negative capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding reliable: recurrence of bleeding on long-term follow-up. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19(28):4520-5. PMC: 3725376. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i28.4520. View

3.
Postgate A, Despott E, Burling D, Gupta A, Phillips R, OBeirne J . Significant small-bowel lesions detected by alternative diagnostic modalities after negative capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68(6):1209-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.035. View

4.
Triester S, Leighton J, Leontiadis G, Fleischer D, Hara A, Heigh R . A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100(11):2407-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00274.x. View

5.
Gerson L, Fidler J, Cave D, Leighton J . ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Small Bowel Bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110(9):1265-87. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.246. View