» Articles » PMID: 34035651

Factors Associated with Intended Postpartum OGTT Uptake and Willingness to Receive Preventive Behavior Support to Reduce Type 2 Diabetes Risk Among Women with Gestational Diabetes in Singapore: An Exploratory Study

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2021 May 26
PMID 34035651
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To assess and explore the factors affecting willingness to undergo an early postpartum oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and receive postpartum lifestyle modification assistance.

Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-method design was used. A prenatal cross-sectional survey questionnaire (n = 216) was given to women diagnosed with GDM in a tertiary health institution in Singapore and followed up with postpartum semi-structured interviews (n = 30). Multivariate logistic regression and thematic analysis were conducted before merging the findings.

Results: Despite universal GDM education, fewer than 75% intended to take the OGTT postpartum, and only 63% felt it was very important. The plan to take the OGTT postpartum was positively associated with a prenatal care provider's specific recommendation. In contrast, Malay women were less likely to take the test. Most women interpreted a care provider's recommendation as implying standard practice, which encouraged intended and actual compliance with testing after giving birth. The perception of moderate to high T2DM risk in the following decade, and subsidized prenatal care, and plan to take the OGTT postpartum were positively associated with willingness to receive postpartum lifestyle behavior support. A mobile application was the preferred method to receive support.

Conclusions: In the early postpartum period, women with a history of GDM were willing to receive measures to reduce T2DM risk, primarily if it was under the supervision and recommendation of a care provider. A carefully designed but simple postpartum lifestyle intervention incorporating these preferences that can be integrated into mainstream diabetes prevention programs is warranted.

Citing Articles

Implementing care for women with gestational diabetes after delivery-the challenges ahead.

Eng P, Teo A, Yew T, Khoo C Front Glob Womens Health. 2024; 5:1391213.

PMID: 39221169 PMC: 11362992. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1391213.


Relationship between serum uric acid in early pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study.

Duo Y, Song S, Zhang Y, Qiao X, Xu J, Zhang J Endocrine. 2023; 83(3):636-647.

PMID: 37782356 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-023-03544-y.


Barriers to and enablers of type 2 diabetes screening among women with prior gestational diabetes: A qualitative study applying the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Lake A, Williams A, Neven A, Boyle J, Dunbar J, Hendrieckx C Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2023; 4:1086186.

PMID: 36993822 PMC: 10012118. DOI: 10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1086186.

References
1.
Kim C, Newton K, Knopp R . Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(10):1862-8. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.10.1862. View

2.
Bellamy L, Casas J, Hingorani A, Williams D . Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009; 373(9677):1773-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5. View

3.
Feig D, Chen E, Naylor C . Self-perceived health status of women three to five years after the diagnosis of gestational diabetes: a survey of cases and matched controls. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178(2):386-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)80030-6. View

4.
von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Prev Med. 2007; 45(4):247-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.012. View

5.
Ton T, Fogg T, Fong C, John C, Li S, Marshall J . Knowledge, perception, and behaviors of relatives of people with premature heart disease: a systematic literature review. Circulation. 2011; 124(8):958-64. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.940593. View