» Articles » PMID: 34032899

Comparison of the Clinical Course of COVID-19 Infection in Sickle Cell Disease Patients with Healthcare Professionals

Overview
Journal Ann Hematol
Specialty Hematology
Date 2021 May 25
PMID 34032899
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is highly expected that COVID-19 infection will have devastating consequences in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients due to endothelial activation and decreased tissue and organ reserve as a result of microvascular ischemia and continuous inflammation. In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical course of COVID-19 in adult SCD patients under the organ injury mitigation and clinical care improvement program (BASCARE) with healthcare professionals without significant comorbid conditions. The study was planned as a retrospective, multicenter and cross-sectional study. Thirty-nine SCD patients, ages 18 to 64 years, and 121 healthcare professionals, ages 21 to 53, were included in the study. The data were collected from the Electronic Health Recording System of PRANA, where SCD patients under the BASCARE program had been registered. The data of other patients were collected from the Electronic Hospital Data Recording System and patient files. In the SCD group, the crude incidence of COVID-19 was 9%, while in healthcare professionals at the same period was 23%. Among the symptoms, besides fever, loss of smell and taste were more prominent in the SCD group than in healthcare professionals. There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of development of pneumonia, hospitalization, and need for intubation (43 vs 5%, P < 0.00001; 26 vs 7%, P = 0.002; and 10 vs 1%, P = 0.002, respectively). Prophylactic low molecular weight heparin and salicylate were used more in the SCD group than in healthcare professionals group (41 vs 9% and 28 vs 1%; P < 0.0001 for both). The 3-month mortality rate was demonstrated as 5% in the SCD group, while 0 in the healthcare professionals group. One patient in the SCD group became continously dependent on respiratory support. The cause of death was acute chest syndrome in the first case, hepatic necrosis and multi-organ failure in the second case. In conclusion, these observations supported the expectation that the course of COVID-19 in SCD patients will get worse. The BASCARE program applied in SCD patients could not change the poor outcome.

Citing Articles

COVID-19 outcomes among patients with sickle cell disease or sickle cell trait compared to the general population: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Dawudi Y, Azoyan L, Bonjour M, Steichen O Ann Hematol. 2024; 103(12):5071-5083.

PMID: 39658700 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-06113-z.


COVID-19 outcomes in patients with sickle cell disease and sickle cell trait compared with individuals without sickle cell disease or trait: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Michelon I, Vilbert M, Pinheiro I, Costa I, Lorea C, Castonguay M EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 66:102330.

PMID: 38162948 PMC: 10755716. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102330.


Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals with sickle cell disease: an integrative review.

Pereira L, da Silva M, Germano C, Estevao I, Melo D Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1144226.

PMID: 37200963 PMC: 10187638. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1144226.


Thrombo-Inflammation in COVID-19 and Sickle Cell Disease: Two Faces of the Same Coin.

Chiang K, Gupta A, Sundd P, Krishnamurti L Biomedicines. 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 36830874 PMC: 9953430. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020338.


COVID-19 outcomes in sickle cell disease and sickle cell trait.

Christian J, Lanzkron S, Naik R Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2022; 35(3):101382.

PMID: 36494153 PMC: 9450487. DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2022.101382.


References
1.
Hassell K . Population estimates of sickle cell disease in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38(4 Suppl):S512-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.022. View

2.
Karacaoglu P, Asma S, Korur A, Solmaz S, Buyukkurt N, Gereklioglu C . East Mediterranean region sickle cell disease mortality trial: retrospective multicenter cohort analysis of 735 patients. Ann Hematol. 2016; 95(6):993-1000. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-016-2655-5. View

3.
Kocak R, Alparslan Z, Agridag G, Baslamisli F, Aksungur P, Koltas S . The frequency of anaemia, iron deficiency, hemoglobin S and beta thalassemia in the south of Turkey. Eur J Epidemiol. 1995; 11(2):181-4. DOI: 10.1007/BF01719485. View

4.
Conran N, Belcher J . Inflammation in sickle cell disease. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018; 68(2-3):263-299. PMC: 6314308. DOI: 10.3233/CH-189012. View

5.
Yotsumoto Fertrin K, Costa F . Genomic polymorphisms in sickle cell disease: implications for clinical diversity and treatment. Expert Rev Hematol. 2010; 3(4):443-58. DOI: 10.1586/ehm.10.44. View