» Articles » PMID: 34031816

Evaluation of Vitreous Procalcitonin As a Diagnostic Biomarker in Infectious Endophthalmitis

Overview
Journal Int Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2021 May 25
PMID 34031816
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Endophthalmitis is a potentially blinding intraocular infection following intraocular surgery or trauma. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are important in preventing devastating visual complications. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a promising biomarker for diagnosing bacterial infections. The aim of the study was to measure vitreous PCT in infectious endophthalmitis and assess its utility as a biomarker.

Methods: In this prospective study, vitreous was collected from patients with non-infectious retinal disorders and infectious endophthalmitis. PCT was measured using the Human Procalcitonin ELISA Kit. The diagnostic performance of PCT was calculated via receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results: The study included three groups: patients with non-infectious retinal conditions, culture-positive endophthalmitis, and culture-negative endophthalmitis. The average PCT was 75.74 ± 26.8 pg mL, 100.24 ± 12.9 pg mL, and 126.41 ± 26.47 pg mL in control, culture-negative, and culture-positive endophthalmitis, respectively. There was a significant difference in the vitreous PCT in the study and control groups (p = 0.04), but not between culture-positive and culture-negative endophthalmitis (p = 0.65). The sensitivity (66.7%) and specificity (65%) for PCT with a cut-off of ≤ 54.88 pg mL(p = 0.31) implied that its diagnostic accuracy was not significant. But there was a significant difference in gram-negative (68.2 ± 16.5 pg mL) and gram-positive (175.09 ± 45 pg mL) (p = 0.02) bacterial infections; the sensitivity and specificity were 70%, with a cut-off of ≤ 82.3 pg mL.

Conclusions: This study showed that vitreous procalcitonin concentration might not be a suitable biomarker for diagnosing culture-negative endophthalmitis though it could help distinguish between gram-positive and gram-negative infections.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the utility of inflammation score in post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis. Results from a prospective study in India. EMS Report #4.

Das T, Belenje A, Joseph J, Pandey S, Behera U, Dave V Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023; 72(1):81-86.

PMID: 38131575 PMC: 10841797. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_997_23.

References
1.
Weber D, Hoffman K, THOFT R, Baker A . Endophthalmitis following intraocular lens implantation: report of 30 cases and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis. 1986; 8(1):12-20. DOI: 10.1093/clinids/8.1.12. View

2.
Speaker M, Milch F, Shah M, Eisner W, Kreiswirth B . Role of external bacterial flora in the pathogenesis of acute postoperative endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98(5):639-49; discussion 650. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32239-5. View

3.
Das T, Kunimoto D, Sharma S, Jalali S, Majji A, Nagaraja Rao T . Relationship between clinical presentation and visual outcome in postoperative and posttraumatic endophthalmitis in south central India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2005; 53(1):5-16. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.15298. View

4.
Naik P, Singh S, Dave V, Ali M, Kumar A, Joseph J . Vitreous D-Lactate Levels as a Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Presumed Infectious Culture Negative Endophthalmitis. Curr Eye Res. 2019; 45(2):184-189. DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1662057. View

5.
Wacker C, Prkno A, Brunkhorst F, Schlattmann P . Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013; 13(5):426-35. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70323-7. View