» Articles » PMID: 34031004

Outcomes of Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated With Gemtuzumab-Ozogamicin: Cue To Optimized Chemotherapy Backbone

Abstract

Background: The optimal approach to combine gemtuzumab-ozogamicin (GO) with various chemotherapy backbones and other newer agents safely remains to be determined.

Materials And Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the safety and outcomes of adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with GO with intensified versus standard anthracycline doses (daunorubicin dose 90 mg/m vs 60 mg/m) ± FLT3 inhibitors. The χ test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare categorical and continuous data. Survival estimates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and survival comparisons made using log-rank test.

Results: We report a 97% overall response rate in 34 patients with newly diagnosed AML with a median age of 54 years (19-75 years) treated with GO and standard induction. The 11 patients (100%) receiving GO plus daunorubicin dose 90 mg/m as part of 7 + 3 induction achieved complete response versus 91% (20/22) complete response in the standard daunorubicin dose group (P = NS). No increased toxicity was noted with the higher daunorubicin dose or when GO and 7 + 3 were combined with FLT3 inhibitors in 3 younger patients (<60 years). Two older patients treated with GO+7 + 3 and FLT3i experienced grade 3 or higher cardiotoxicity. We observed a longer estimated event-free survival for patients with newly diagnosed AML in our cohort (median, 24 months; 95% confidence interval, 17.2 to not reached) compared with historical data.

Conclusion: We demonstrate that anthracycline dose intensification with GO may offer higher response rates without increased toxicity in younger patients presenting with de novo AML across European Leukemia Net risk categories.

Citing Articles

Limited efficacy of 3 + 7 plus gemtuzumab ozogamycin in newly diagnosed fit intermediate genetic risk acute myeloid leukemia patients.

Serio B, Grimaldi F, Ammirati L, Annunziata M, De Santis G, Perrotta A Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024; 7(4):e2044.

PMID: 38662362 PMC: 11044913. DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.2044.


Gemtuzumab ozogamicin plus standard induction hemotherapy improves outcomes of newly diagnosed intermediate cytogenetic risk acute myeloid leukemia.

Awada H, Abdelmalek M, Cronin T, Baron J, Kashour Z, Azad F Blood Cancer J. 2023; 13(1):131.

PMID: 37666807 PMC: 10477319. DOI: 10.1038/s41408-023-00910-x.


Intensified-Dose Chemotherapy in Combination With Gemtuzumab-Ozogamicin for the Treatment of Favorable-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

Vegunta R, Harel R, Steinberg A Cureus. 2022; 14(6):e26240.

PMID: 35898381 PMC: 9308398. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26240.

References
1.
Lee J, Joo Y, Kim H, Bae S, Kim M, Zang D . A randomized trial comparing standard versus high-dose daunorubicin induction in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2011; 118(14):3832-41. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-361410. View

2.
Burnett A, Hills R, Milligan D, Kjeldsen L, Kell J, Russell N . Identification of patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia who benefit from the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin: results of the MRC AML15 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 29(4):369-77. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.4310. View

3.
van der Velden V, Te Marvelde J, Hoogeveen P, Bernstein I, Houtsmuller A, Berger M . Targeting of the CD33-calicheamicin immunoconjugate Mylotarg (CMA-676) in acute myeloid leukemia: in vivo and in vitro saturation and internalization by leukemic and normal myeloid cells. Blood. 2001; 97(10):3197-204. DOI: 10.1182/blood.v97.10.3197. View

4.
Lancet J, Uy G, Cortes J, Newell L, Lin T, Ritchie E . CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) Liposome for Injection Versus Conventional Cytarabine Plus Daunorubicin in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(26):2684-2692. PMC: 6127025. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6112. View

5.
Bross P, Beitz J, Chen G, Chen X, Duffy E, KIEFFER L . Approval summary: gemtuzumab ozogamicin in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2001; 7(6):1490-6. View