» Articles » PMID: 34029336

Is It Worth It? The Costs and Benefits of Bringing a Laptop to a University Class

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 May 24
PMID 34029336
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Students often bring laptops to university classes, however, they do not limit their laptop use to class-related activity. Off-task laptop use occurs frequently in university classrooms and this use negatively impacts learning. The present study addresses whether potential benefits of class-related laptop use might mitigate the costs of off-task laptop activity. We used tracking software to monitor both class-related and off-task laptop use by undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory psychology course, and we observed how types of laptop use related to course performance. We found a positive correlation between class-related use and exam scores that was driven by viewing lecture slides during class. We also found a negative correlation between off-task laptop use and exam scores, but class-related activities did not predict an increase in off-task use. Thus, for students who constrain their laptop use to class-related activity, the benefits outweigh the costs. While a laptop may be beneficial for some, it is unclear which students are able to constrain themselves to class-related activities and whether the benefits of class-related laptop use obtained by slide viewing could be achieved by other means. Thus, students and educators should carefully consider the costs and benefits of laptop use in the classroom.

Citing Articles

Online teaching and learning: Experiences of students in a nursing college during the onset of COVID-19.

Molefe L, Mabunda N Curationis. 2022; 45(1):e1-e10.

PMID: 36453822 PMC: 9723967. DOI: 10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2372.

References
1.
Fernandes M, Moscovitch M . Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000; 129(2):155-76. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.2.155. View

2.
Naveh-Benjamin M, Guez J, Sorek S . The effects of divided attention on encoding processes in memory: mapping the locus of interference. Can J Exp Psychol. 2007; 61(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1037/cjep2007001. View

3.
Schutten D, Stokes K, Arnell K . I want to media multitask and I want to do it now: Individual differences in media multitasking predict delay of gratification and system-1 thinking. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017; 2(1):8. PMC: 5281665. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-016-0048-x. View

4.
Ravizza S, Uitvlugt M, Fenn K . Logged In and Zoned Out. Psychol Sci. 2017; 28(2):171-180. DOI: 10.1177/0956797616677314. View

5.
Frey M, Detterman D . Scholastic Assessment or g? The relationship between the Scholastic Assessment Test and general cognitive ability. Psychol Sci. 2004; 15(6):373-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00687.x. View