Participation of Acoustic and Electric Hearing in Perceiving Musical Sounds

Overview

Journal Front Neurosci

Date 2021 May 24

PMID 34025335

Citations 6

Authors

Sonia Duret

Emmanuel Bigand

Caroline Guigou

Nicolas Marty

Philippe Lalitte

Alexis Bozorg Grayeli

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The objective of our study was to evaluate musical perception and its relation to the quality of life in patients with bimodal binaural auditory stimulation. Nineteen adult patients with a cochlear implant (CI) for minimum 6 months, and moderate to severe contralateral hearing loss with a hearing aid (HA), and 21 normal hearing adults were included in this prospective, cross-sectional study. Pure-tone and speech audiometry, musical test evaluating sound perception characteristics and musical listening abilities, Munich questionnaire for musical habits, and the APHAB questionnaire were recoded. Performance in musical perception test with HA, CI, and HA + CI, and potential correlations between music test, audiometry and questionnaires were investigated. Bimodal stimulation improved musical perception in several features (sound brightness, roughness, and clarity) in comparison to unimodal hearing, but CI did not add to HA performances in texture, polyphony or musical emotion and even appeared to interfere negatively in pitch perception with HA. Musical perception performances (sound clarity, instrument recognition) appeared to be correlated to hearing-related quality of life (APHAB RV and EC subdomains) but not with speech performances suggesting that the exploration of musical perception complements speech understanding evaluation to better describe every-day life hearing handicap. Testing musical sound perception provides important information on hearing performances as a complement to speech audiometry and appears to be related to hearing-related quality of life.

Citing Articles

Music Perception, Appreciation, and Participation in Postlingually Deafened Adults and Cochlear Implant Users: A Systematic Literature Review.

Bleckly F, Lo C, Rapport F, Clay-Williams R Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241287391.

PMID: 39582273 PMC: 11587190. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241287391.

State-of-the-Art on the Impact of Bimodal Acoustic Stimulation on Speech Perception in Noise in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Casarella A, Notaro A, Laria C, Serra N, Genovese E, Malesci R Audiol Res. 2024; 14(5):914-927.

PMID: 39452469 PMC: 11504522. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres14050077.

Hearing outcomes following cochlear implantation with anatomic or default frequency mapping in postlingual deafness adults.

Fan X, Yang T, Fan Y, Song W, Gu W, Lu X Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 281(2):719-729.

PMID: 37548704 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08151-1.

Comparison of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Questionnaires in a Large Cohort of Self-Reported Normal-Hearing Adult Listeners.

Srinivasan N, ONeill S Audiol Res. 2023; 13(1):143-150.

PMID: 36825952 PMC: 9952610. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres13010014.

The aesthetic emotional expression of piano music art in the background of Internet of things.

Zhang X, Kang Q Front Psychol. 2022; 13:974586.

PMID: 36312074 PMC: 9598870. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974586.

References

Dritsakis G, van Besouw R, Kitterick P, Verschuur C . A Music-Related Quality of Life Measure to Guide Music Rehabilitation for Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Am J Audiol. 2017; 26(3):268-282. DOI: 10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0120. View

Keilmann A, Bohnert A, Gosepath J, Mann W . Cochlear implant and hearing aid: a new approach to optimizing the fitting in this bimodal situation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 266(12):1879-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-009-0993-9. View

Nemer J, Kohlberg G, Mancuso D, Griffin B, Certo M, Chen S . Reduction of the Harmonic Series Influences Musical Enjoyment With Cochlear Implants. Otol Neurotol. 2016; 38(1):31-37. PMC: 5154854. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001250. View

Cheng X, Liu Y, Shu Y, Tao D, Wang B, Yuan Y . Music Training Can Improve Music and Speech Perception in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Cochlear Implant Users. Trends Hear. 2018; 22:2331216518759214. PMC: 5833165. DOI: 10.1177/2331216518759214. View

Vroegop J, Dingemanse J, van der Schroeff M, Goedegebure A . Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users. Am J Audiol. 2018; 28(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1044/2018_AJA-18-0067. View

Devocht E, Janssen A, Chalupper J, Stokroos R, George E . The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality. Trends Hear. 2017; 21:2331216517727900. PMC: 5604840. DOI: 10.1177/2331216517727900. View

Hutter E, Argstatter H, Grapp M, Plinkert P . Music therapy as specific and complementary training for adults after cochlear implantation: A pilot study. Cochlear Implants Int. 2015; 16 Suppl 3:S13-21. DOI: 10.1179/1467010015Z.000000000261. View

Brockmeier S, Grasmeder M, Passow S, Mawmann D, Vischer M, Jappel A . Comparison of musical activities of cochlear implant users with different speech-coding strategies. Ear Hear. 2007; 28(2 Suppl):49S-51S. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180315468. View

Rosen S . Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992; 336(1278):367-73. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0070. View

10.

Firszt J, Holden L, Reeder R, Cowdrey L, King S . Cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2012; 33(4):521-33. PMC: 3383437. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31824b9dfc. View

11.

Wong P, Ciocca V, Chan A, Ha L, Tan L, Peretz I . Effects of culture on musical pitch perception. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e33424. PMC: 3324485. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033424. View

12.

Driscoll V . The Effects of Training on Recognition of Musical Instruments by Adults with Cochlear Implants. Semin Hear. 2013; 33(4):410-418. PMC: 3595548. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329230. View

13.

Kong Y, Stickney G, Zeng F . Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005; 117(3 Pt 1):1351-61. DOI: 10.1121/1.1857526. View

14.

Richard C, Ferrary E, Borel S, Sterkers O, Bozorg Grayeli A . Interaction between electric and acoustic cues in diotic condition for speech perception in quiet and noise by cochlear implantees. Otol Neurotol. 2011; 33(1):30-7. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31823c9461. View

15.

Shirvani S, Jafari Z, Motasaddi Zarandi M, Jalaie S, Mohagheghi H, Tale M . Emotional Perception of Music in Children With Bimodal Fitting and Unilateral Cochlear Implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015; 125(6):470-7. DOI: 10.1177/0003489415619943. View

16.

Brockmeier S, Fitzgerald D, Searle O, Fitzgerald H, Grasmeder M, Hilbig S . The MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int. 2011; 12(1):10-20. DOI: 10.1179/146701010X12677899497236. View

17.

Avan P, Giraudet F, Buki B . Importance of binaural hearing. Audiol Neurootol. 2015; 20 Suppl 1:3-6. DOI: 10.1159/000380741. View

18.

Smith L, Bartel L, Joglekar S, Chen J . Musical Rehabilitation in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With a Self-administered Software. Otol Neurotol. 2017; 38(8):e262-e267. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001447. View

19.

Riley P, Ruhl D, Camacho M, Tolisano A . Music Appreciation after Cochlear Implantation in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018; 158(6):1002-1010. DOI: 10.1177/0194599818760559. View

20.

Oh Y, Reiss L . Binaural Pitch Fusion: Binaural Pitch Averaging in Cochlear Implant Users With Broad Binaural Fusion. Ear Hear. 2020; 41(6):1450-1460. PMC: 7501189. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000866. View