» Articles » PMID: 34024085

Transforming Growth Factor-beta and Liver Injury in an Arginine Vasopressin-induced Pregnant Rat Model

Overview
Date 2021 May 24
PMID 34024085
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Approximately 30% of preeclamptic pregnancies exhibit abnormal liver function tests. We assessed liver injury-associated enzyme levels and circulating transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) levels in an arginine vasopressin (AVP)-induced pregnant Sprague-Dawley rat model.

Methods: Pregnant and non-pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats (n=24) received AVP (150 ng/hr) subcutaneously via mini-osmotic pumps for 18 days. Blood pressure was measured, urine samples were collected, and all animals were euthanized via isoflurane. Blood was collected to measure circulating levels of TGF-β1-3 isomers and liver injury enzymes in pregnant AVP (PAVP), pregnant saline (PS), non-pregnant AVP (NAVP), and non-pregnant saline (NS) rats.

Results: The PAVP group showed significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure than both saline-treated groups. The weight per pup was significantly lower in the AVP-treated group than in the saline group (p<0.05). Circulating TGF-β1-3 isomer levels were significantly higher in the PAVP rats than in the NS rats. However, similar TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 levels were noted in the PS and PAVP rats, while TGF-β2 levels were significantly higher in the PAVP rats. Circulating liver-type arginase-1 and 5'-nucleotidase levels were higher in the PAVP rats than in the saline group.

Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate higher levels of TGF-β2, arginase, and 5'-nucleotidase activity in PAVP than in PS rats. AVP may cause vasoconstriction and increase peripheral resistance and blood pressure, thereby elevating TGF-β and inducing the preeclampsia-associated inflammatory response. Future studies should explore the mechanisms through which AVP dysregulates liver injury enzymes and TGF-β in pregnant rats.

Citing Articles

The Clinical Value of Rodent Models in Understanding Preeclampsia Development and Progression.

Ramdin S, Baijnath S, Naicker T, Govender N Curr Hypertens Rep. 2023; 25(6):77-89.

PMID: 37043097 PMC: 10172248. DOI: 10.1007/s11906-023-01233-9.

References
1.
Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Gagliardi G, Novelli G . Early and late preeclampsia: two different maternal hemodynamic states in the latent phase of the disease. Hypertension. 2008; 52(5):873-80. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.117358. View

2.
Levine R, Maynard S, Qian C, Lim K, England L, Yu K . Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(7):672-83. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa031884. View

3.
Shekhar S, Diddi G . Liver disease in pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 54(5):475-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.01.004. View

4.
August P, LEVENTHAL B, Suthanthiran M . Hypertension-induced organ damage in African Americans: transforming growth factor-beta(1) excess as a mechanism for increased prevalence. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2000; 2(2):184-91. DOI: 10.1007/s11906-000-0080-5. View

5.
Scroggins S, Santillan D, Lund J, Sandgren J, Krotz L, Hamilton W . Elevated vasopressin in pregnant mice induces T-helper subset alterations consistent with human preeclampsia. Clin Sci (Lond). 2018; 132(3):419-436. PMC: 5947858. DOI: 10.1042/CS20171059. View