» Articles » PMID: 34021903

To Meat or Not to Meat: Disordered Eating and Vegetarian Status in University Students

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2021 May 22
PMID 34021903
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study sought to examine associations between meat-restricted diets and disordered eating cognitions and behaviors in a large sample of university students and assess the relationships between motivations for choosing a vegetarian or semi-vegetarian diet and eating patterns.

Methods: University students (n = 1585; 60%F, 40%M, mean age 20.9) completed an online survey; students were categorized into vegetarians, semi-vegetarians, and non-vegetarians. Vegetarians and semi-vegetarians were sub-categorized into groups: those who cited weight or health among their reasons for adopting the diet and those who reported other reasons (e.g., religion). Outcomes were Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) scores and rates of disordered eating behaviors.

Results: Vegetarians comprised 8.6% (32M, 104F) and semi-vegetarians comprised 3.2% (6M, 45F) of the sample; 25% of vegetarians (n = 34) and 65% of semi-vegetarians (n = 33) chose the diet for weight or health-related reasons. Semi-vegetarians scored the highest on measures of eating disorder cognitions and were the most likely to report engaging in disordered eating behaviors, with vegetarians at intermediate risk and non-vegetarians the least likely to report disordered cognitions or behaviors. Semi-vegetarians adopting the diet for reasons of weight or health were at especially high risk compared to other semi-vegetarians, while no associations were found between motivations for adopting a vegetarian diet and disordered eating patterns.

Conclusion: Semi-vegetarians, especially those adopting the diet for reasons of weight or health, are more likely to exhibit disordered eating cognitions and behaviors compared to vegetarians and non-vegetarians.

Level Of Evidence: Level III, cohort study.

Citing Articles

Genetics of vegetarianism: A genome-wide association study.

Yaseen N, Barnes C, Sun L, Takeda A, Rice J PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0291305.

PMID: 37792698 PMC: 10550162. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291305.


Disordered eating and the meat-avoidance spectrum: a systematic review and clinical implications.

McLean C, Kulkarni J, Sharp G Eat Weight Disord. 2022; 27(7):2347-2375.

PMID: 35729472 PMC: 9556390. DOI: 10.1007/s40519-022-01428-0.

References
1.
Bardone-Cone A, Fitzsimmons-Craft E, Harney M, Maldonado C, Lawson M, Smith R . The inter-relationships between vegetarianism and eating disorders among females. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 112(8):1247-52. PMC: 3402905. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.05.007. View

2.
Forestell C . Flexitarian Diet and Weight Control: Healthy or Risky Eating Behavior?. Front Nutr. 2018; 5:59. PMC: 6048256. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00059. View

3.
Forestell C, Spaeth A, Kane S . To eat or not to eat red meat. A closer look at the relationship between restrained eating and vegetarianism in college females. Appetite. 2011; 58(1):319-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.10.015. View

4.
Klopp S, Heiss C, Smith H . Self-reported vegetarianism may be a marker for college women at risk for disordered eating. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003; 103(6):745-7. DOI: 10.1053/jada.2003.50139. View

5.
Lavender J, De Young K, Anderson D . Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q): norms for undergraduate men. Eat Behav. 2010; 11(2):119-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.09.005. View