» Articles » PMID: 34021777

Selection of Safe Artemisinin Derivatives Using a Machine Learning-based Cardiotoxicity Platform and in Vitro and in Vivo Validation

Overview
Journal Arch Toxicol
Specialty Toxicology
Date 2021 May 22
PMID 34021777
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The majority of drug candidates fails the approval phase due to unwanted toxicities and side effects. Establishment of an effective toxicity prediction platform is of utmost importance, to increase the efficiency of the drug discovery process. For this purpose, we developed a toxicity prediction platform with machine-learning strategies. Cardiotoxicity prediction was performed by establishing a model with five parameters (arrhythmia, cardiac failure, heart block, hypertension, myocardial infarction) and additional toxicity predictions such as hepatotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, mutagenicity, and tumorigenicity are performed by using Data Warrior and Pro-Tox-II software. As a case study, we selected artemisinin derivatives to evaluate the platform and to provide a list of safe artemisinin derivatives. Artemisinin from Artemisia annua was described first as an anti-malarial compound and later its anticancer properties were discovered. Here, random forest feature selection algorithm was used for the establishment of cardiotoxicity models. High AUC scores above 0.830 were achieved for all five cardiotoxicity indications. Using a chemical library of 374 artemisinin derivatives as a case study, 7 compounds (deoxydihydro-artemisinin, 3-hydroxy-deoxy-dihydroartemisinin, 3-desoxy-dihydroartemisinin, dihydroartemisinin-furano acetate-d3, deoxyartemisinin, artemisinin G, artemisinin B) passed the toxicity filtering process for hepatotoxicity, mutagenicity, tumorigenicity, and reproductive toxicity in addition to cardiotoxicity. Experimental validation with the cardiomyocyte cell line AC16 supported the findings from the in silico cardiotoxicity model predictions. Transcriptomic profiling of AC16 cells upon artemisinin B treatment revealed a similar gene expression profile as that of the control compound, dexrazoxane. In vivo experiments with a Zebrafish model further substantiated the in silico and in vitro data, as only slight cardiotoxicity in picomolar range was observed. In conclusion, our machine-learning approach combined with in vitro and in vivo experimentation represents a suitable method to predict cardiotoxicity of drug candidates.

Citing Articles

Biological Response Following the Systemic Injection of PEG-PAMAM-Rhodamine Conjugates in Zebrafish.

Custodio B, Carneiro P, Marques J, Leiro V, Valentim A, Sousa M Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(5).

PMID: 38794270 PMC: 11125904. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16050608.


Mechanism of Artemisia annua L. in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: network pharmacology, molecular docking and in vivo validation.

Liang D, Yixuan D, Chang L, Jingjing S, Sihai Z, Jie D Mol Divers. 2023; 28(5):3225-3242.

PMID: 37898972 DOI: 10.1007/s11030-023-10750-3.


Revolutionizing Medicinal Chemistry: The Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Early Drug Discovery.

Han R, Yoon H, Kim G, Lee H, Lee Y Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023; 16(9).

PMID: 37765069 PMC: 10537003. DOI: 10.3390/ph16091259.


The cardiac glycoside ZINC253504760 induces parthanatos-type cell death and G2/M arrest via downregulation of MEK1/2 phosphorylation in leukemia cells.

Zhou M, Boulos J, Klauck S, Efferth T Cell Biol Toxicol. 2023; 39(6):2971-2997.

PMID: 37322258 PMC: 10693532. DOI: 10.1007/s10565-023-09813-w.


An artificial intelligence approach for predicting cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline.

Chang W, Liu C, Feng Y, Liao C, Wang J, Chen Z Arch Toxicol. 2022; 96(10):2731-2737.

PMID: 35876889 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-022-03341-y.

References
1.
Banerjee P, Eckert A, Schrey A, Preissner R . ProTox-II: a webserver for the prediction of toxicity of chemicals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(W1):W257-W263. PMC: 6031011. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky318. View

2.
Briggs K, Cases M, Heard D, Pastor M, Pognan F, Sanz F . Inroads to predict in vivo toxicology-an introduction to the eTOX Project. Int J Mol Sci. 2012; 13(3):3820-3846. PMC: 3317745. DOI: 10.3390/ijms13033820. View

3.
Cai C, Fang J, Guo P, Wang Q, Hong H, Moslehi J . In Silico Pharmacoepidemiologic Evaluation of Drug-Induced Cardiovascular Complications Using Combined Classifiers. J Chem Inf Model. 2018; 58(5):943-956. PMC: 5975252. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00641. View

4.
Cheng Y, Wu R, Cheng M, Du J, Hu X, Yu L . Carboplatin-induced hematotoxicity among patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Analysis on clinical adverse events and drug-gene interactions. Oncotarget. 2016; 8(19):32228-32236. PMC: 5458280. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12951. View

5.
Cifelli C, Rose R, Zhang H, Voigtlaender-Bolz J, Bolz S, Backx P . RGS4 regulates parasympathetic signaling and heart rate control in the sinoatrial node. Circ Res. 2008; 103(5):527-35. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.180984. View